ZOOM

all you needed to do here was acknowledge that you initially responded to the wrong thread. the post you responded to, by ThePriceIsRight, referred to the partner of this specific woman. if you were "addressing the more general comments about how it was offensive for any woman to be thought of as an "incubator", you…

the discussion is of a specific person; the partner in this specific case. you answered a direct statement about this specific person. you were not addressing a general comment.

the reportage clearly states that the partner did not want the somatic treatment continued.

you referred directly to this case. you made a suggestion that is demonstrably wrong, which i helpfully highlighted so you'd know exactly what my response was referring to. trying to imply that i'm missing the point of your meandering irrelevant anecdotes and hypotheticals doesn't make your statement less wrong.

looks fucking shite.

oops sorry, didn't see you already had a reply to the question

in the first comment thread on this:

and i'm addressing the idea that the partner might want her used to carry the baby—he didn't.

heh

m'lady

Maybe she/he would have been grateful to have even that much left of someone he/she loved?

Big Irish Catholic lobby?

'mincemeat'

it's not meat, it's dried fruit. there is no meat involved.

shop-bought mince pies are terrible, much like most things shop-bought; don't judge 'em on that

fuck's sake. mincemeat is nothing to do with meat; the suet is a setting agent, like gelatine in jell-o.

summerttiiime lo-o-ovvin', lovin' in the summertime

But this is like Feminism for Dummies...It's kindergarten feminism. It gets us nowhere.

it's still great for annoying straightlords though