Because the Porsche press office got fed up of me & Mike constantly asking.

Graham Goodwin, Sam Collins, and others were talking about it earlier this year and I think finally got motivated enough to dig and Porsche couldn’t think of a reason not to be open about it.

Because it conflicts with the goals of the people funding their studies?

Duck Tape R Us.

Carbon based life forms often reply with an emotional response.

Recalls like this are always a little amusing to me because they usually affect something that would have normally have been ignored by the owner and failed eventually due to normal wear & tear. But for some reason, there are recalls issued for some of these things, but not all of them. I still have no idea how…

This revelation makes Whitesnake happy.

FUN FACT: You can see her nipple at 2:18 if you pause at the right time

He’ll be right up there with Clebold and Harris as one of the greatest shooters in Columbine history.

That dudes gettin’ a sloppy back seat BJ later.

This is not Gawker

*sigh*

Same.

No, that’s pretty much what I expected

These seemed worthy, too.

#corrections The Engine is either a 400 big block or a 351 Cleveland. There was no 400ci Cleveland made but the 400 was based off of the Cleve’s design.

Customer: But it worked with a Land-Rover!

Sad thing is, I always love FCA’s commercials...and Eminem...and I’m an FCA loyalist....but this is just ridiculous. I had one as a company car for several month...holy moly what a piece of garbage.

I’ll go with this one for the worst of the worst C4s:

Reducing pollution is always an honorable goal, and we have reduced pollution from most all fossil fuel-burning sources ca. 90-95% over the years. Eliminating that last few percent gets asymptotically more expensive, especially when the vast majority of the rest of the world has done nothing and plans to do nothing…