@Hamsterpants: And it's red. You know what that means.

@dripdrop: It's just a very general, wishy-washy, nonpartisan issue. No matter your politics, you can agree that fat kids are bad!

@AtomiClash humanitarian mizanthrope: And made larger in comparison the width of her torso.

@baseballchica03: It looks okay to me. She's got her hips at an odd angle, she's squished against a wall, and the black bikini bottom is creating a bit of a optical illusion with the shadow. It's not at all unreasonable that her hip bone, given those things plus her general thinness, would look like that.

You know, phrenology assumes a brain.

Fox News: The Boob Tube for Rubes

Kim's story makes me want to scrape my eyes out with shards of martini glasses and pour expensive liquor into the bloody sockets.

"The more a person matches your speech and behavior patterns, the more you like them. The more you like them, the more you match their speech and behavior.

@LoSpaz: @mbprice: When you start to say four, like the pizza man at your door ... that's amore ...

@lucyjae: I would be concerned a cultural reference to early-season Lost would go right over their little heads.

@wtfox?!: Fuck yes!

I'm not ashamed to say I would write this email.

Jesus didn't put a ring on it.

@socialist.chic: Agreed.

@Legs: I think you're right on about the role distortion of perspective plays in this. The more I think about the author's complaint, here, the more examples I am coming up with of lovely, successful women who are portrayed positively or neutrally ... but we don't notice them because they are the protagonists.

I would like these fuckers to waste time, money, and resources for something productive. Like a one-way mission to Mars for themselves.

@sarichkaa: Those aren't galoshes! Those are good old rubber boots. If you want good rubber boots that will keep your feet dry and won't split, don't even bother with Hunters or whatever. Get LaCrosse or go home (wet).

@ricardvs: Yeah. The article could really have done without the discussion of elegance and Grace Kelly and the stylish self-presentation of the Natashas. I don't disagree with the basic point at all - although I think there are many successful, not-villianized women in TV and film (they are all over police…

@harlequin13: I do agree with the author that demonizing successful women is deeply problematic. However, she isn't just talking about success but about appearance, manners, etc. ... things that have nothing to do at all with success but everything to do with class and privilege, some of which are absolute…

@Legs: Thank you. After reading your comment, I was actually thinking in regards to that last line: It is interesting that the author here picks out Mr. Big's Natasha on Sex and the City as a paradigmatic example of elegant-woman-as-heinous-evil-villain when SATC's Charlotte is a character who has it all - privilege,…