Just like Halo made FPSes for the consoles viable and acceptable - let's see how Blizzard will do it. I still can't picture it, since Diablo is more mouse-moving click click click rather than mouse-is-camera click click click.

If it helps, it's only the end-game content. Get to Hell and then quit. :)

Great, now some poor kid will have a Wii U that smells like someone's butt.

I doubt those programming gods are good at the very twitchy Quake3. But it would be awesome to bring it full circle.

You can knock on WoW all you want. But remember that WoW fine-tuned a genre so games like Rift can exist. Enjoy Rift. Have fun with it. Because in a year, you'll probably latch onto the next shinier MMO and complain about how Rift is all stale and old.

I like this feature. Something I hated was having to grind through the last levels just to get some good gear. My favorite levels were the end of Act 2, all of Act 4, and the beginning of Act 5, and would grind through those levels repeatedly because they were fun. But their loot drops sucked in comparison.

You can definitely tell JRPGs apart, depending on the spiky haired emo main protagonist.

I wouldn't be surprised by any method North Korea uses to smuggle money into their country. One story, a North Korean agent is given a wad of fake american dollars and trades it for real american dollars in China (at a exchange rate of $60 real dollars for every $100).

It's still buy a copy get a another copy free.

I know this is wishing, but I do hope CS goes the route of current FPSes. That includes health-regen, vehicles, hoard mode, tower defense, and all that. I know a lot of old school CS fans will hate it, but that's what classic Counter-strike is for. I just want a really good military FPS on Steam that isn't owned by a…

I bet this is going to be F2P. Valve probably wanted to have the original CS: Source free to play. But then it would need to have micro-transactions, and piss off a shitload of fans who see a sudden rush of newbs ruining their game.

I know Diablo isn't a MMO. But it's how I prefer my MMOs to be. If I want to party or trade, I can through a hub. If I want to solo it, I want to be in my own instance, where I explore without somebody killing my prey. A strong single-player experience with a online connectivity.

There was a bunch of complaining about the Call of Duty con. But the thing about that con is that for $150, AND you got the game. I expect a LOT of complaining for this con.

Diablo and Guild Wars is how I like my MMOs. Huge world-changing narrative, followed by an option to meet people online. World of Warcraft started to do that with Cataclysm, which I really liked.

My condolences. But I have a few PSPs laying around. Does he need a replacement? I can provide that service.

All I read were angry minecraft fans who want patches and updates every 6 hours. The same people who 'll bitch to blizzard for making their class sucky. The same people who scream at the sky for raining.

I don't think I look for that sort of fun with iphone games the way I look for fun with a actual video game. I only play during bathroom breaks, while waiting in line, or at lunch time. I treat it like porn — I just need a quick fix before going about my day.

It's exactly like that!

It's kinda creepy for me to listen to my own voice. I'd be judging every statement and nitpicking every scene. It looks like Jennifer Hale is doing the same. She should have just played as dude Shepard.

Really?! Why would you buy L4D and not the sequel?