How is passing out not revoking consent? You don't have to continuously "check in" to know the person you are fucking in conscious. That should be, umm, quite obvious. And yes, if she's having sex with him and he falls unconscious and she doesn't stop, that's rape too. What makes you think that would change my opinion…

You do what? I have no idea what you are talking about.

Ever person has the right to revoke consent after a sex act has begun. If sex continues after consent is revoked, it is now rape. Being unconscious is a lack of consent so it stands to reason that once a person passes out, consent is revoked and the sex needs to stop immediately.

You think that's saggy? I think your perspective is a bit off. Also, advertising? Wut?

My knees are this bruised most of the time. I guess I do have a job where I do a fair amount of physical stuff, lifting, crawling, etc. Maybe from dancing/working out etc?

Yes, but fat is only a couple percent of the milk.... How could it increase the sugar by 25%?

Interesting, I wonder why that would be since they don't add any sugar and it's all just the natural lactose.

Sorry, only 10 months old. I suck at math.

And if your kid is dead, your kid is dead, regardless of ambulance or tow truck or whatever. What does that have to do with anything?

?? Okay, I found the blog post in which she says she is going to San Diego for a medical procedure, and it is over a year old. If you read it too, you would know that. Just because someone doesn't like one doctor doesn't mean that can never trust another doctor in that entire country again.

Postpartum procedure? Her youngest child is over a year old, so that hardly seeems relevant to this article?

Were those posts deleted or something? I can't find anything of the sort..

Jez (and other outlets) are just being clickbait-y and obnoxious.

Yeah, these folks could probably afford it, but it might not be practical to decide anyone needing Coast Guard rescue has to pay. There are likely lots of not-rich people who require rescue and shouldn't be afraid to call for it (people who fish for a living, for example).

It seems many of the news articles are being deliberately inflammatory, since the kid had been treated weeks before they set sail and the doctor said she had fully recovered.

They set sail several weeks after she had been sick and the doctors told them she was fully over it.

The child was sick several weeks prior and had already been treated and the doctors thought she was fully recovered...

The child wasn't sick when they left, she had been treated and recovered.

I don't know the statistics, but is sailing that much more dangerous than driving a car? I mean, why even let our children out of the house with that reasoning.

I guess I didn't see it as "refusing to care for a sick kid" — she had been sick, she was treated, they continued on their trip. It was a few weeks later that she got sick again and their boat broke at the same time, requiring the rescue. This article gave more detail about it: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/lyra-kauf…