I guess I just don’t understand what the proposed solution is. I agree that he is good enough to be on an NFL roster. He’s probably better than several starters in the league. But he took a stance, and some people didn’t like that stance, and as a result NFL teams don’t want to touch him with a 10 foot pole. I…

This take is incredibly boring. Believe it or not, a lot of people who watch ESPN do actually watch it for the sports. It would be fairly easy to make the argument that ESPN loses viewers because of the amount of time they spend taking political stances instead of spending the majority of the time talking about…

If you’re interested in this kind of thing, CaptainDisillusion on YouTube does a great job of explaining how a lot of these faked videos are done. He’s corny, but fun, and does a good job explaining in detail how the videos were faked:

This (all too common) response legitimately makes me cringe. Someone being sarcastic and holding a different opinion than you should never warrant this kind of hateful response. Please grow up.

He didn’t say that women shouldn’t be allowed to work in tech. He said that men are more drawn to the engineering side of things, so that could be the reason why there is an imbalance there. He said that he doesn’t think Google should hire women just because they are women. And, more importantly, he stated that he…

There’s no moral high-ground to take by hoping Mayweather wins. If anything you should take the stance that no one should pay to watch a woman-beater and a racist fight each other for millions of dollars. It’s truly puzzling how you can offer your support to a violent abuser over a racist troll. Both are gross, all…

This is one of the more pathetic posts I’ve seen on here in quite some time. We agree on one thing: Trump makes us both sick. Now that we’ve got that out of the way, does accuracy matter to you at all? Or do you just search for any excuse to “tear down” Trump? You’re doing the opposite. You’re playing into his…

OK, first off: I’m wrong. I went back and reread his post and it definitely smells like a troll. Not sure what I was thinking before. I was/am/can be an idiot.

“SEXISM IS EVERYWHERE. EVERY MAN IS SEXIST.” You’re just screaming into an echo chamber, and you seem so pleased with what you’re hearing back. Call out real sexism, it certainly exists. This dilutes your point and frankly takes away your credibility for the next time you scream “SEXISM”. I feel bad for the real…

The irony is clearly lost on you. Who’s trolling, the person who writes a thought out response, or the one who posts a bullshit meme claiming the other is “trolling”? Today’s “feminists” are pathetic. You do more harm to your cause than good by jumping on the outrage bandwagon while not having any legitimate…

Kenosha with the shoutout! Love it, even though the factory is no more...it’s kinda a sad place to drive by. You could probably do a ton of mudding where the factory used to be.

Or she’s just not that original or funny for that matter. I don’t think I’ve ever heard an original joke from her. They are always the equivalent of a poop joke, a play off of something that someone else has said, or are pretty much explicitly plagiarized. There are much better female comedians to get behind. I…

Still wouldn’t find her funny. I like plenty of female comedians: Broad City is one of my favorite shows, Iliza Shlesinger is great, Melissa McCarthy always makes me laugh, and Katherine Ryan had one of my favorite all time specials on Netflix. I don’t care what funny looks like or what gender it is, I just want it to…

I was not ready for this, even though it was blatantly obvious that I should have been based on the title, and now I’m sitting at my desk at work all puffy-eyed and my colleagues are probably thinking that I’m having a breakdown of some sort. Read the whole column, it’s worth it: an awesomely powerful love story. It…

I really don’t know why you’re talking about the First Amendment, it has literally nothing to do with what I said. I’m just disagreeing with the idea that the publisher has a responsibility to refuse to publish the book. What it sounds like to me is, “I don’t like what Milo stands for, so Simon & Schuster shouldn’t…

“A publishing company refusing to publish a book is not censorship. The government banning a book is censorship.”

I’m glad you were able to learn so much about a stranger on the internet from a 3 sentence comment.

But to be more clear, I’m saying that if you expect a business to align with your definition of morality over their bottom line, you’re going to be incredibly disappointed with the vast majority of companies that…

Well if they committed a violent crime or various violent crimes in order to write the book, I’d say that’s a pretty obvious line to draw. This is does not appear to be that in any way, but if the book comes out and it shows Milo participating in gang rape or mutilation children, ok you win, but you know that’s not…

This provides a lot of context. While it may not change my overall view about the publisher’s moral stance, it adds much needed perspective to the impact of Simon & Schuster’s decision to publish Milo’s book. Thanks much for the insight, it is appreciated.

In a sense you’re correct. But I’m quite confident that they’ve published many authors that don’t align with Simon & Schuster’s values. That means that the endorsement is likely purely monetary, as opposed to actually being an approval of the author’s idiotic views.