Lol, when someone’s intellectual property lawyers come after you one day, you just keep telling yourself that. Of course for a tiny YouTube clip it doesn’t apply, but get into longer form and you’re in for a world of hurt.

Not even close. Using “ideas”, like character traits, settings, enemy strengths, conflict concepts and such are impossible to protect and reused all the time.

You seem to misunderstand product placement entirely. It’s not just a singular random appearance of a product. There are specific rules and contractual obligations as to location, lighting, frequency, timing, framing, etc.

Talk about group of idiots. You just don’t get it. Hate Clinton all you want, but that doesn’t IMPROVE the viabilty or qualifications of TRUMP. He’s a liar, bad businessman and basically a very uneducated, immature goon.

Give it up already. Quadcopters above hand-sized, and particularly those used for photo/video use are called Drones now and always will be.

Uh no, there are aerodynamic/power limits involved as well, which are just a major as radio range.

You need not build your own. Turn key drones in the Phantom class are capable of twice that altitude and more.

The local geography is not that high. Plus the rules are also see and avoid manned aircraft, and depending on how close to the airport this was, there is a prohibition right down to ground level without special permissions.

Not really a correlation. Drone pilots need far, far more distance and altitude for commercial projects and frankly recreational use than the limited tiny fields that RC fixed wing pilots use.

Much of the mid to higher end stuff uses 5.8 GHz, so no wifi issues.

Yes, but Toronto’s not in the mountains, it’s only about 700 ft. of that ASL altitude.

Not that I agree with Mr. “limit everything”, but the reason you can fly that high is specifically because you have to remain very tightly around that tower, which aircraft are already avoiding. Not the same as higher free flight.

Cheaper yes. “Better” - subjective. Helos use very large gyro stablized cameras which most people agree still provide superior shots to drone footage. Safer? No. The limited view from the ground and small FPV view from the drone means a helo with a pilot and observer on board are typically much safer for seeing and…

Actually no, his point makes no sense if you actually know what AGL and ASL mean.

Lol, your statement makes no sense in relation to the original poster OR in relation to aircraft performance.

Here’s a clue, there’s people 30-50 years older than you who have been gaming for nearly 40 years. It’s already “normal”.

Good, we’ll be there in about 20 years, and see you about 20-40 years after that, I’m guessing.

Lol, “first ones of the generation” Way, way, way far from it I’m guessing.

Nope, because you’re asking for “perfection”. Even now, auto manufacturers take a pass on expensive safety equipment, lawyer up, and reserve finances for lawsuits to cover PREDICTED levels of fatalities in the use of their vehicles. Known levels of future deaths, not even remote “possibilities” like these “trolley”…

Nope. Auto manufacturers including Tesla right up front said that they would self-finance the liability issue with their autonomous cars right up front immediately.