You might expect that, but all the evidence goes to show that they never do. Hardly evidence of anti-male bias when the school ignores women who are being harassed just as enthusiastically.

Yeah because yelling show us your tits is really calling out racism.

Would be good if we had any reliable sense of what would help to rehabilitate misogynistic sex offenders. But... we don’t. The system isn’t rehabilitative. We don’t know what would be. The best case scenario right now is keeping assholes off the street for as long as possible.

Well, when that issue is whether or not we should harass women about rape on social media...

You’ve literally not said one single thing that was true during the course of this conversation. But hey, your weird defensive spiral is fun to watch.

You’re right. Donald Trump invented the word “sad.” Your ad hominem attack is so devastating that I’ve forgotten what a pissant you’re being about the fact that someone corrected you.

Dude, you were wrong. Give up. It’s just getting sad.

I’m sure you’ve already reached that point regarding your comments today.

You are not wrong.

Of course I’ve had the feeling that someone was lying to me. I’ve just never presented that feeling as substantive evidence. You say I’m “splitting hairs,” but that couldn’t possibly be a more disingenuous characterization. You can objectively and empirically prove that someone is not telling the truth by using…

Deadspin commenters are so emotional.

“Interesting” is a matter of opinion. Whether or not someone is lying is a matter of fact. You can’t actually be wrong about what interests you, although I suppose you could lie about it. I’m really not sure why you’re having trouble determining the difference between a subjective opinion and an objective fact.

It’s interesting to hear you talk about your “internal radar” for spotting liars, and how much this has improved your life given the ample scientific evidence that 1) people are no better than chance at detecting lies, 2) often the better you think your internal detection mechanism is, the worse it actually is, and 3)…

You’re not just talking about the story. You’re talking about how you think crime victims behave, and you’re doing so in a way that perpetuates harmful and wrongheaded ideas about “normal” victims that have no basis in an actual understanding of human psychology. By all means, poke holes in the story. But talking…

Saw the video. Looks like a bunch of dudes with their hands in the air on the sidewalk while someone takes their shit.

Did not know the brazilian government had a jezebel account.

The award for least probable interpretation of events goes to...

By one of the most corrupt organizations, do you mean the Brazilain government?

Can we not actively perpetuate dumb victim myths? People respond to trauma in a lot of different ways. Your TV based perception of how someone would react to a robbery is not reality.

Except for the most common cancers (skin, breast, prostate, etc) a lot of people do think of them that way.