I was about to repost a text version of this comment (ctrl+f didn't find your post). I'm glad I noticed it.

It's only irrational to be more concerned of a breakdown in a computer controlled car than a non-computer controlled car.

The same that happens when it happens to someone today. Only you have a rational computer at the controls instead of a panicking 16 year old.

Thank you!

No, they are not. Your current vehicle is currently just as likely (and more if you consider the very real possibility that your new smarter car will be much more active in monitoring your car's health) to break down.

I'm late to this party, but I think you're quite a bit off on the width. My googling is failing me for Charlotte, but Martinsville (a much smaller track) is roughly 55 wide. http://www.martinsvillespeedway.com/The-Speedway/A…

Right, but he stopped reading.

Yeah, I wouldn't fix a fridge either. I'd call a professional.

It's a good thing this doesn't happen with current cars.

Where's the horns???

You forgot Desmond Dekker.

I also missed any broken ankles. He had him a little mixed up, but I thought the point of a "broken ankle" was the fake so hard it left the defender on the ground.

How did I forget this. Now I'm sad :(

I can't be the only one that hears this (a mashup would be amazing)

If two are bad, three are worse. My dad had a Spitfire and my uncle had a TR250 (which these are from, though I doubt his ever looked this pretty). They both have told me they spent far more time under the car than inside it.

You apparently missed the point of my argument. I'm not saying that Randolph getting suspended was undeserved. Just the OPs statement about if it had been KD instead.

Point
Your head.

lol

You still haven't explained how it isn't rigged. If the rules don't apply equally, what exactly is the point? (and no, if the refs have to make a judgement call on the rules based on which players are involved, then the players are not controlling the outcome)

Justified? lol