Restaurants have more expensive seatings on holidays like NYE though, right?

Google maps says it's an hour and 24 minutes to walk. At 2am in the winter that might not be a good idea.

Ew. Seriously?

Currently working on "I Don't Want To Talk About It, Jeremy"

I am so glad that you had a wonderful wedding, but there are plenty of women who don't want to get married, or don't want a wedding, or find joy in other things. There are also plenty of people who find nothing but pain and suffering in marriage. What works for you doesn't work for everyone, and pitying other women…

I think it gives a better sense of closure to that chapter of her life by the artistic expression. I think she should be afforded the chance to be selfish in this case: her life has changed. Let her be!

I think at this point we all fully realize that reality shows are scripted to a large extent. But because CBS might have "scripted" scenes where a woman gets fired for not wanting to wearing a bikini top on TV and having a CEO gleefully rewarded with breast implants for doing well at her job is not a reason to just…

Yeah, I don't think the fact that a CEO of a "breastaurant" is a sleazy sexist jerk is a OMG KEYSER SOZE moment for any of use, really. It's that CBS offered said jerk a spot on a highly visible primetime show and tried to pass it off as heartwarming gobbley goo hopefully without anyone noticing how vile this shit…

Undercover Boss has already shown Hooters and Tilted Kilt, but this one was, by far, the worst. It must be an awful place to work. The managers all talked about how hard it was to hang onto staff, and two women quit during the one night he worked at one of the restaurants.

The real question is: Why the hell would CBS put someone like this on their show?

If he was honest, his headline would reference that he is looking to have a sexual fantasy fulfilled, not that he is only offering a ride. To me, the main creepiness is him putting it in the wrong category, as if women should just expect to be asked to perform a sex act in exchange for a ride. What he really wants is…

Well, actually he's being honest about shoving down your throat.

The problem is that many haves, who are unaware of the realities of being a have not, make decisions without the knowledge, whether policy or business practices.

A box cake ($2), plus icing ($2), plus eggs ($4/12), plus candles ($2), plus baking pan ($5), plus non-stick spray ($4) could easily cost more than a generic-premade cake at Publix.

THIS! OMG. I don't think there's a way people on SNAP can win - because if you buy healthy, nutritious food, you get judged for buying "expensive" things with food stamps. But if you buy junk food, well, you shouldn't be buying junk with food stamps! I've come to the conclusion that it's not about what people…

no, you should by cheap junk food. No wait, that's bad too. you should buy fresh vegetables. Oh crap, that's high falutin. how about hot dogs? what, you feed your poor kids that crap? just buy some air!

It makes me rage. You care so much about the penny you pay toward welfare that you'd begrudge a kid a fucking cake on their birthday. I swear I hate the kind of people you are talking about with the heat of a million suns.

Or maybe that person doesn't have a stove. I currently don't have a working stove because my landlord is too cheap to fix the broken one we have so I can't bake/cook anything that requires it. I've been looking for a studio and the vast majority of them don't even offer a kitchenette, but rather a small office…

OH HELL, and the shit-storms of people complaining because some Poor Person bought a fucking BIRTHDAY CAKE with food stamps. Because poor children don't DESERVE a cake!

My cousin's wife bitched about someone using SNAP to buy a birthday cake from the Publix Bakery, on FB one time and my best friend and I lit into her about it. She even said that the person could have bought a box mix and that she had box mix cakes all the time growing up. I had to point out that not everyone can…