would you take this deal:

mentioning the high marginal rate without mentioning:

or — imagine this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogaden_War

“the “murderous killer” you’re indicting via proxy here brought vast advances in literacy, health care, and overall quality of life to Cuba despite the crushing force of an embargo by the world’s most powerful economy.”

in general the theme seems to be more about “generic Republican” than specific to Trump (i.e. lots of concern on who picks SCOTUS) — with maybe a qualifier that Trump seems more likely to outsource policy specifics to people around him than the average President.

re: Supreme Court

honest question:

Elections are won/lost by getting a marginal 5-10% of the voting electorate to move one direction or another

with Jurgen, there is always the qualifier to all those good qualities....

maybe said differently — if you oppose Trump, does it make sense to declare Republicans who also opposed Trump as enemies?

the key word in that tweet is “fiscal”

As a % of GDP, i stand corrected. My statement on absolute remains.

so —

so — Obama, even 8 years into a recovery he says is great — has run budget deficits larger every single year of his administration that are larger in both absolute terms and as a % of GDP than anything Bush (W) did.

as is usually the case, some segment of people hear “fewer regulations” and go directly to “no building codes whatsoever”

1. What has Timmy Chandler done to justify his seemly automatic insertion into the starting 11?

I think a distinction needs to be made between public employee unions and “regular” unions

you have two people to choose from that meet your criteria: John Hickenlooper of Colorado and Steve Bullock of Montana.

you are likely correct.