Agree — although “dominate” is too strong. Play well, contribute for a upper tier Bundesliga team, look like he belongs, etc — yes
Agree — although “dominate” is too strong. Play well, contribute for a upper tier Bundesliga team, look like he belongs, etc — yes
that would be a distinction without a difference
SCOTUS nominees get voted down from time to time (as noted above). Would everyone feel better if Garland simply had been voted down? I’m not sure how that would have changed anything other than a lot of Senate / press pants wetting over it.
isnt the self voidable contract a way for a team to pay a player more, not less?
“At least some SEIU members have announced plans for a huge May Day strike. Will you participate?”
pre-insurance: $2,000 emergency room bill was a problem
“actual legitimate social science”
“progressive” and “exercising power in a restrained and careful fashion” dont go together, almost by definition.
i get that the diff between a potentially high lottery pick and, lets say, losing 1-4 to the GS Warriors may be compelling enough for a team on the edge to tank
how about “Elizabeth hasnt botched it”
Truly sad to see, and i hate tanking — that being said:
weird: California has been basically a one party state for the last decade plus— a Dem party that, per its rhetoric, is all about helping the poor.
ok:
shorter version of above story: politicians use laws on books to enforce their values rather than intent of said laws
the two bolded paragraphs above are pretty anodyne statements-
i would really like to see Uber’ financials and see if Horan is correct, or, a guy with a pov and conclusions to suit it.
would really like to see the analysis that suggests that its fare only covers 40% of the cost of such fare.
multiple competing people, not tied to the government — but appointed and supervised by the government. Presumably, some Fed Govt entity will have to vet, choose and supervise these people managing the SWF. If they are appointed, then they are controlled. Again: that is an enormous amount of power concentrated in…
“Also, the less concentrated capital ownership is the less power individual owners have to sway government decision making.”
“Jacobin”