Ah, the Edwards v Duke election. Crook v Klansmen. Hate to say it, but I feel pretty damn certain that election would’ve gone the other way in today’s environment, tribalism being what it is.

Yes, but while Jay collects antique cars, Sean collects antique political and moral beliefs.

Did you hear the guy say on the news basically say satanic forces were afoot in bringing Moore down? Forgot his exact words but he definitely said satanic. And didn’t hesitate to ask why she waited so long.

Now I want to know what Hannity will say if he publicly denounces Moore and Moore wins anyway.

The GOP can’t remove him from the ballot at this point. They’d have to run a write-in campaign, which would require significant expenditure to get the name of the alternate candidate out there and probably result in splitting the red vote and giving the election to Doug Jones.

Which sounds to me like a win-win-win, but…

“...you’ve lost a hateful moronic hypocritical smug semi-sentient potato.”

I distinctly recall Jon Stewart once introducing him in a clip as “talking neck Sean Hannity.”

How is Moore supposed to prove a negative if he’s indeed “innocent”? This sounds moronic. I bet tomorrow Hannity will be like “I’ve spoken to Mr Moore and he denied ever doing something bad so that’s proof enough to me, vote for him people!”. There’s always a loophole with these people to come up on top “morally” so…

Has Sean’s neck always been the exact width of his head? He looks like he’s morphing into an Otter Pops character.

There is a quote about Vietnam - “if you’ve lost Cronkite, you’ve lost America.” Let me repurpose that here. “If you’ve lost Hannity, you’ve lost a hateful moronic hypocritical smug semi-sentient potato.”

Oh man, the ride-or-die Moore supporters have a pretty big overlap with the believe-everything-Hannity-says crowd. Who will they take to Twitter in support of? Some brains are exploding out there in Red State Land tonight.

“Americans need 100% TRUTH & HONESTY”

And I’ve read that due to treaty obligations and other constraints on where the fence could be built, there are things in the US that are south of the fence.

You’re giving him far too much credit, even in jest. The man couldn’t even make casinos profitable and all casinos do is make money. “The house always wins” and he lost it all.

Honestly, I really think that’s the main thing. I think his creditors have kept him just rich enough to sustain his brand, but I don’t remotely believe he has these vast riches that he claims to have. If he had documents proving himself to be as wealthy as he pretends, he’d be whipping them out at every press…

It’s pretty much a certainty that his tax returns tell a story that is either shameful or embarassing.

I have no doubt he’s got ties to Russia, financial and otherwise. But the reason *I* think he doesn’t want anyone to see his taxes is because one look will tell everyone that he’s not even close to as rich as he’s been saying he is; I’d estimate he’s got a few million maybe, and he knows there’s not a way to spin that…

This one actually makes several salient points. Best of the series thus far, IMO.

It’s one of the problems I have with this site since it launched. Every time I come to it, I feel like it is dialed up to 10 on the bitter, righteous anger dial for something like....cologne. For all its flaws, at least gawker had a sense of humor to lighten things up

You don’t want to ban nursing homes, which can be very useful for some recovering patients or those without family but funds or good insurance, who want to feel looked after in all respects.