confidentmediocrewhiteman
ConfidentMediocreWhiteMan
confidentmediocrewhiteman

By your username, I can guess that The Smiths are on that list.

Nice! Haven’t heard D-Plan since college!

Well, if you believe the U.S. actually has a duty to help other countries “catch up”, that isn’t necessarily a bad thing... and is presumably, part of the point behind student visa’s requiring a strong connection to their home country.

Even without the “merit” based system of immigration, even taking away the morality of deporting someone to a land in which she has never lived, how does anyone justify deporting someone who has already benefited by being in America (free public schools, relatively safe neighborhoods, etc.), is about to be at the

Obviously, the best course of action for a person who has spent her life since age 7 in the United States, has had American tax dollars spent on her education, has excelled to the point of being on the cusp of achieving a PhD, and probably thinks of herself as American as any of her classmates, is to be kicked out of

Long way to go for the punchline, but He looked upon it, and He saw that it was good!

The good news about the Senate is that Republicans have yet to figure out how to gerrymander states. In those cases, they need to resort to outright voter suppression and fraud, like in North Carolina and Georgia.

Eloquently put! Those among us of any merit have nothing to fear by acknowledging that others, with different point of views and beliefs, different religions and skin tones, are also people of merit.

I look forward to getting 8 gallons to the mile.

“Recently, an article showed up on a small tabloid about blackmail attempts on our student organization by people removed from CRU. This is nothing but a hit piece and not worthy to reply to directly,” the statement said. “These former members cherry-picked excerpts out of context from our old Facebook Messenger CRU

I hope you are right about our nation not *yet* being a lost cause.

Oh, they have no idea what they want!

I in no way doubt that they are deliberately pushing people to read it because enough of their base will agree.

They now have until April 12th, but I doubt that anything they do from now until then with match our government’s stupidity. They at least have factions that disagree on what Brexit should be, from full withdrawal from Europe, to “soft” exit with few tariffs, to no Brexit at all.

David Shanks said, “Others have referred to this publication as a ‘manifesto’, but I consider it a crude booklet that promotes murder and terrorism. It is objectionable under New Zealand law.”

There is but one answer:

Gotta go with the classic: