Sounds like you need to read more zines. Go down to your community photocopier and hang around until my contact arrives. He’ll be the white dude with dreadlocks, you can’t miss him.

I am, absolutely, very sorry you didn’t understand the definition of a very common debate term. It must have made this conversation quite difficult and confusing for you!

Yes. You keep responding to people who explain why your invented reasons are bullshit by saying that your last point didn’t actually matter, what really matters is this entirely different point you just made up. And when it turns out that new requirement you invented would also have eliminated some of the included…

She is both relatively unknown AND not on TV

Do you actually need me to quote the posts, instead of just summarizing them? Because you’ve made multiple longish posts on the subject, and trying to paste them all into a single comment would probably break Kinja.

It appears you don’t actually know what “moving the goalposts” means, which I suppose isn’t particularly surprising. It has nothing to with “backing off your point” or “being a coward.” It means doing exactly what I just quite comprehensively illustrated you doing, adding new goals or rules until you hit the place…

One other exception that nobody has pointed out yet: Bill Maher is not a late night host. His show airs in primetime.

That's why you have to keep adding new rules! The balance that excludes the women (and frequently people of color, as well) is always there. You just have to keep tailoring your argument until you hit it.

You included two reasons. She wasn’t recognizable, and her show hadn’t yet aired. When people pointed out that multiple included men were equally unrecognizable, you added justifications for why that wasn’t actually important. Yes, James Cordon is hardly known, he gets abysmal ratings, and he is not a “Titan” in any…

if even by the rigged rules of all of this — she’s going to be on the same network as Conan Obrian, *thus* should also be included in this photo, (especially from a smart marketing perspective - which is what magazines are, marketing)

Yes. You keep responding to people who explain why your invented reasons are bullshit by saying that your last point didn’t actually matter, what really matters is this entirely different point you just made up. And when it turns out that new requirement you invented would also have eliminated some of the included…

What’s it like being “that guy”?