Idk his job is to report on a subject all of us enjoy reading about. Alienating half of his audience isn’t the way to get there

I literally thought your were talking about the charistics of the missile and the delivery that was intended

Your right, we just have a miscommunication. I made an assumption about the missiles themselves I was wrong. Because your right there were fewer of them. My bad.

Jesus your going to sit there and lecture me about how mature the real world is? If the world was rational and NOT the school yard we wouldn’t even be reading these blogs.

Your spot on sir

Your spot on for this one bulldog.

Yeah man bigger missiles holding more and more warheads is kind of the point. The peacekeeper wasn’t in the wrong direction like you suggested. At the time of course that was the only option. These kind of icbm’s couldn’t be Caught till the midcourse phase....... the size of the missile has to carry 10+ warheads and…

I think he is talking about the perpetual bashing.

Rofl

Is this program a separate program that was terminated by the Obama administration some years ago?

Couldn’t have said it better

It all makes more sense when you think of China as a adolescent child. Knowing some day the inevitable will happen. It can be as big and strong as it’s dad. But what do children do or all humans for that matter? They persistently test the fence. Why not? The point I’m getting at is that for the past 8 years and 7ish…

I second that

Nothing there is nothing to gain for the Federation. Everything to loose.

Exactly why the hell would they want to spend more? We do all the heavy lifting. There is no incentive to do so, just par for the course.

When haven’t the Russians had a hand in the elections? It’s basically fair game We lead by example

Thanks for clearing that up

Agreed

Don’t forget the high altitude blast that will be one of the first strikes.

Because us petty Americans would rather hear about shit that doesn’t matter like the size of some Hollywood stars breasts.