If you need to expose your wine to the right amount of air, chances are you already own a wine decander or aerator, and therefore don’t need special glasses to do this job for you.

They did prove it in a fair trial.

You can’t see that? Why don’t you go count the number of lightbulbs in your house and then take a look at your latest electricity bill to determine what portion of that bill goes to running your lightbulbs.

What part of well over $100 means flat rate to you?

With 8 hours of daylight in the winter months, most lights are on for a lot longer than 3-8 hours, especially if you’re talking about security lights and office lights. Those are on almost all of the time, so yes it matters that their lifespan is only 2 years when the good quality ones cost well over $10. A typical…

The only person who has sexual tension on tv with Matt Lauer is Tom Cruise.

I think that would require Katie to have some balls, which she does not.

If you care about electricity waste, then why do you have any kind of decorative lights on at all?

Average electricity costs do not apply. What counts is what rate YOU actually are charged.

You think you can prove a point by citing a spam site advertising LED bulbs for $1.20? LOL. A bulb that costs $1.20 is not going to last you 22 years, fool. Even the stated 18,000 hours is just over 2 years, not 22 years like you claimed.

“Is it likely that he did this” is a binary question, so the sentence is not funny or “sucking away meaning” unless you’re an effing moron who can’t read or understand what jury verdicts mean.

They acted improperly by doing what? Not telling the defense that they had recordings of his phone calls in prison? In what universe do you think prison phone calls are not recorded and handed over if the prosecution requests them?

LEDs are not cheap. All the money you think you’re saving on electricity is spent on the price premium you pay buying LEDs.

All we have to go on is the prison recordings and his own statements. The whole case rests on he-said-she-said statements of the parties involved.

The prosecution did meet its burden. The only reason you’re arguing that there’s some miscarriage of justice is because he’s black.

It certainly DOES matter if the validity of the science was in question at the time of the trial when you’re arguing that the validity of the science is grounds for a new trial.

The validity of the science was never in question.

Getting a new trial means that he could potentially go free because his sentence is overturned.

So how do you resolve a custody dispute over property, then?

I don’t know what the ef your problem is. I have been to Catholic healthcare places and nobody gave me a Bible or material with Bible quotes. Nobody made me feel like a whore or lectured me about my lifestyle. They were competent in their work, and did things exactly the same as non-religous affiliated facilities I…