Eh, then you have the later quote which can be taken to defend Rolling Stone and Erdley again -

I’m going to repost something I did when the first trailer hit. (And a follow for ungreying would be nice too.)

I thought the paragraph following “I’ve written for Rolling Stone over the years” more than offset the later tsk tsking in its milquetoast - it read as if she is auditioning to write for them again - and Erdley’s motivations come off far better than they have elsewhere.

You can definitely be endoscoped without sedation - it’s not uncommon to do so outside of the US.

I was actually planning on buying this book until I read this article.

It’s not that different, then. The major difference here may be prior to hospice admission (either at home or admits to inpatient) the care provided is strictly limited by whatever insurance you have. Once you’re actually in hospice, the support and care become much more comprehensive and similar to that you…

In the US we tend to lean on the former a lot more heavily than the others for hospice, although they’re all dispensed in quantity (to the point where I’ve had a quiet discussion or two about ‘are you doing this for the patient’s comfort or the family members and your own?’)

Thank you for this. I only read the proposal today - largely because I looked at their CVs and didn’t think a couple ex Philly prosecutors were too outrageous - and haven’t asked any of my friends in the academy about it.

Some do. Most don’t. Ask those in the MFT line of work about it if you’re curious, because one of the tenets of how they deal with couples therapy is to focus less on the actual cheating and more of what was going on in the relationship prior to it.

I wouldn’t disagree that it can be all on one partner - that’s the classic situation where one partner just shouldn’t be in a relationship, period - but you know what? If she’s outright admitting that she’s inflicted problems, and if she gave an ultimatum that early in the dating stage, there’s very little chance…

Yep. This is what jumped out at me about LW1:

Even a couple months later, thank you for this response. As you pointed out, not only are their numbers wrong, but the only way this is ever going to get addressed as a society is if we give equal weight to the roles that both genders play in caregiving.

A good example may be if you come back in about 2 or 3 hours to read the comment section on the piece that was posted 20 minutes after this one.

I didn’t realize until I saw the photo booth picture and looked it up that she’s 13 years younger than he is (67 and 54). She doesn’t just look like a kid in them, but was one, being all of 22 when they met (when she apparently pursued him).

Eh, there isn’t a speed limit on the water because unless it’s glass you aren’t going to be going all that fast anyway. Your knees and back will thank you later on.

More than likely to get reporters (and perhaps emergency personnel, but I’m not as optimistic about that one) in, and more importantly get people out.

One of the more interesting presentations of imminent death is how blood pressure drops off to the point where it’s not measurable in the extremities.

Odd - I saw you in grey there, but perhaps because I’m involved in the thread?

It appears to be GM sitewide, rather than just Jezebel.

My favorite tweet on this: