Yeah, too bad ubisoft or activision didn't get it. Then we'd have 20 sequels in just 2 years.

It pretty much kills it. Which is good. Now we can have more surprises like that trailer.

I hope you sent this to Iwata himself. I want this feature too. And it better be in Smash Bros.

Who is they? I simply corrected you on the price of the game and informed you, since you seemed not to know, that a lot of people already own a Wii U.

"The last time you checked" was months ago. No one said bayonetta 2 was going to be the best selling game ever. Just that it's going to be amazing. The first game didn't sell like hotcakes either, hence why Nintendo was necessary to get the game published. I guess I'm just confused as to why you think I care about how…

Please point to the stage where you got beasted.

Actually, the game always costs $60. If you don't have a Wii U, then you have to buy the console first. But since 7 million people have already done that, your statement continues to be nonsensical.

Aw, you're so salty.

I've lost count of how many times I've played through the original game. Still going to play it again with all the themed costumes.

No it didn't.

Bayonetta 2 comes out in October.

It actually costs $60.

Well one reason for it not to be Gohan is the use of a scouter. Why would he need it? Particularly in the past he would already know about. But who knows? Maybe Bandai just thinks scouters look cool(they do).

He'd throw excessive text and tutorials at you at the beginning of the boss fight, and when he got down to low health he'd warp you to fetch quests. The most difficult boss in Zelda history.

But they've had Metroid games. What you mean to say is "No new 2D Metroids" (Other M might as well be though.)

"Name not final"
-Your Video

Yeah. God forbid the audience have an opinion about the movie they watched.

Pretty sure Wii Fit counts as AAA, but what's your point?

Yes. And the people that were pro-slavery people were objectively wrong. It was never a complex, debatable issue. A large collective of human beings were just ignorant.

No. Slavery is objectively wrong. It doesn't matter what the consensus is. The same goes for the other issues. No one "decides" it. It is simply inherently wrong to claim a person as your property (continuing to use slavery as an example).