you are not.
you are not.
I can’t be the only one who read “Rhode Island’s youngest state senator” in the headline, glanced down to see a video freeze-frame of Paul DiMaio, and wondered “that’s Rhode Island’s youngest senator?”
Lies. Pence would never betray Mother’s loyalty like that.
I will NOT.
Shit, get her a gofundme and I’ll chip in for anti-misogyny space camp fund!
My 7 year old niece has devised a chart where she puts stickers on squares that are numbered. The numbers correspond to a list of misogynistic hot phrases she hears at school, on TV, from my mother, etc. When her chart is full she hands it to the closest adult and demands $20 for Space Camp.
It is striking to me that our chief idiot is using the same argument as Pill Cosby’s defenders.
It’s the Bill Crosby defence. Only one accuser: she’s lying. More and more women kept appearing, they all can’t be liars. There were too many to ignore. As for Dylan Farrow, one victim should be enough. It’s not a numbers game. She matters, her voice matters and what happened to her matters a lot.
Not to mention, the way Dylan and her family has been vilified would probably deter anyone else from coming forward. Shit, who wants to deal with assholes mocking you and calling you a liar in a national newspaper?
Stephens is practicing lazy journalism. Yesterday he tweeted that if Allen was guilty the judge presiding over the case could have found Allen guilty. The only problem is that this wasn’t a criminal case and Allen was not being tried on his guilt or innocence. The Judge did find that the allegations were credible.
That seems to be a constant thread through all these “let’s not be too hasty” articles in that he only has once accuser. Plenty of those found under #MeToo only had one very vocal accuser in cases but no one cared then but so many people, a surprisingly large amount of women in particular, seem to want to defend Woody…
I just don’t know why people are still carrying water for this scumbag.
Why in the fuck does there need to be more than one accuser?!
I’ve seen some commenters here say that the fact that Woody “only” molested one child is somehow enough evidence that he didn’t even do that. I think this is Law and Order: SUV’s fault. Somehow we all now believe we are experts on child molesters and their behavior and we just KNOW that there MUST be more because NO…
We’re expected to simultaneously believe that men are the arbiters of all logic, reason, and leadership ability while also understanding that men are dumb idiot babies who can’t understand or recognize obvious discomfort or the basic idea that “if you have to persuade someone to do something, they don’t want to do it.”
*Solas reads article*
don’t even get me STARTED on what happens in Tresspasser
Sounds like every text exchange that gets some underage girl to run away with a 40 year old. What an asshole.