clom-gorb
Clom Gorb
clom-gorb

“the Guitar Gun/Sword.”

Oh. So the talking puppet animated at stop-motion speed was normal then, phew!

Knuckles will always be the superior edgy Sonic rival.

I suspect part of the issue is that if you hadn’t explained some of these offensive stereotypes to me just now, I wouldn’t have even spotted them in the mix. Today I learned that fried chicken is somehow offensive, in certain contexts? (???) I mean, sure, maybe that’s offensive to a subculture, but is it bad enough to

It’s also a little misleading to say that only the first model of wii has backwards compatibility. It may be technically true but RVL-001 was sold for 6 years(2006-2011) with backwards compatibilty and the RVL-101 and RVL-102 sold for only 2 and 1 years with the RVL-102 only being sold in Canada. The majority of wiis

I hear ya, but I don’t use the thing portably (maybe once a year if I fly somewhere), and I have an xbox. I only have it to play Nintendo games, because it has the worst controller, the worst UI, and the highest prices. If I could play Nintendo games on any other platform, I’d never purchase another piece of their

“only the first version of the Wii” is a bit misleading, because 90% of Wiis sold were the “first” version. Only at the end of its life when they made a model that sold for like $100 did they strip out the gamecube fuctionality.

You say that, but if they do something like the 3DS’ glasses-free 3D, it could slot into some kind of headset for a budget VR option that wouldn’t even need lenses. Maybe run 1080 portable/3D and 1440 docked.

Yeah, to me “Super Nintendo Switch” feels like an accessory for the SNES. Also, for branding purposes, I don’t see Nintendo putting “Nintendo” inside the name of the console - right now it’s the (Nintendo) Switch. We also had the (Nintendo) Entertainment System, the (Nintendo) DS, etc. (Super Nintendo) Switch just

Nintendo has only once previously released a backward compatible console: the Wii U. Even the 3DS wouldn’t play DS carts...

I’m too old to think that this will have any effect on Pokémon sales at all.

Okay man, calm down. All we’re saying is if Palworld really did use official Pokemon assets in their games, then a lawsuit is justified.

The dude doesn’t know what he’s talking about Japan does in fact have it’s own parody law. It may not be identical to US parody law but it certainly exists. Here’s a article discussing how it works.

Pokemon sword and shield has sold 26 million copies and Scarlet and Violet sold over 23 million.  For Nintendo, the system sells the games and the games sell the system.  It’s a symbiotic relationship for them.

An alternate reality where instead of an action roguelite, the Hades crew made a beautifully written and acted extremely horny tree puncher.

And yet his stunt worked. If they really want to stop this shit they would permaban him. They don’t care.

I mean, screaming “DEATH WISH” before shoving the forks in doesn’t really help in defining the content as “not suicidal”

We need some way to encourage these kinds of streamers to do these stunts for real. Then, the problem should sort itself out.

I think twitch is probably most worried about copycats and someone frying themselves on-stream trying to get famous. The “how long and how publicly would twitch host a dead/dying person before it got caught and stopped” is something that probably keeps twitch’s lawyers up at night.

Now playing

Looks a bit more convenient than the Omni One VR Platform.