clm
CLM
clm

I agree that women are killed more often in domestic violence than men, but the men and women who are actually killed in domestic violence are an incredibly tiny percentage of domestic violence cases. The majority of domestic violence is non lethal and it is nearly cut down the centre. The fact that 45 percent of

I actually don't like Paul Elam at all, I just believe feminists have been incredibly stupid and selfish about domestic violence.

I actually agree that feminism has truly dropped the ball on domestic violence by trying to define it as something that only victimizes women. I see no reason to define one form of domestic violence as horrible and the other as "who cares it's just men".

Mentioned in the comment you replied to I have no problem with her, if she was soooo likeable how come she's unemployed, misogyny right???? Or how come BOTH her tv shows got canceled?

Both featured ensemble casts, which included Susan Sarandon, Tom FUCKING Hanks, Madonna (height of her popularity musically), and Rosie O'donell (at the time everyone's favorite female comic), I'm sure she had her fans, but nobody was like "I totally want to go see this new GENNA DAVIS FLICK, she's my jam!!!!" if so

Are you new to modding or something, because this is pretty common and also inevitable.

yea but there's a possibility he didn't f up. if he is guilty, he is going to be severely punished, so what does suspending him now accomplish? people can accuse people of things they didn't do. are we to always punish the accused as a knee jerk reaction?

why does everyone have a problem with innocent until proven guilty?

I feel like this article did nothing but prove how full of shit social science research is. The 8chan members proved how unreliable the research data is, and then in typical social science fashion, the researcher soldiered on without any reliable data and decided her gut feelings were reliable enough to base an

I haven't seen credible evidence of any organizationally directed threats of sexualized violence.

If you are done throwing "bad words" around you may or may not realize that this "post-mining" of an anonymous(!!!) poster is not evidence at all. I can just go on an anonymous feminist board and post sick shit, screenshot that and than complain about it and reason that this is now evidence for feminism being

First of all, you can say "misogynist" the "ic" isn't necessary or correct, stupid. And no, it's not the norm, no matter how much you want it to be to support your narrative.

Weird. You just described jezebel to a T.

If you were familiar with the vernacular of these image boards, you would know that "amidoinitright" is a meme, sardonically making fun of "newfags" who don't know what they're doing.

I mean, for real? Couldn't this Woolf/Hulsizer process also be applied in the same way to Feminism, and Jezebel?

First of all, anonymous comments from an anonymous message boards should not be used as evidence of any sort of "hatred". This could be anyone from an actual shitdick racist to the author of this blog post.

Citing anonymous comments as evidence is a pretty bad way of proving a point. For all we know, YOU could be the commenter.

Sorry, I disagree. I think that gender is inherent to any character - male or female (or trans). It's a part of identity. And if you take a character and suddenly give them another gender, it's not the same character anymore. If I had been born a man my life and my personality and my experience would have been

It's both. I'm against any type of Ghostbusters remake, but I also take issue with the fact that people think that the fact that Ghostbusters was about 4 guys is irrelevant... I mean, that's like saying that if they remade the Golden Girls except they called it the Golden Boys and it was about old, retired men living

It's not about gender. It's about the fact that this new version would be nothing like the original, and therefore can't be considered a 'remake', so much as an all girls Ghosbusters inspired by the original movie.