Never mind, you’re right.

WHOOPS DOUBLE POST

This happened in Canada, where there is no real legal equivalent to the 5th amendment.

Sorry, poor wording - I meant so long as her support was there in Congress etc. I do think that’s one thing she’s been strong and consistent on.

It’s less about calling her a ‘traitor to the cause’ and more about recognizing that her cause has always been a very status quo form of neoliberalism which, while it might protect some material and reproductive rights for some (so long as the popular support is there), is center-right on a lot of domestic and foreign…

He might not be Nick Lidstrom, but if you don’t think he’s a top 4 guy on most teams, you’re too committed to razzing the Leafs.*

Their defense is a tire fire.

Well, yeah.

Blech. Ask all those Iraqi women with missing limbs how they feel about ‘female solidarity’. Ask the ships full of Vietnamese women turned away by Margaret Thatcher how jazzed they were that a ladyperson was all up in the government, representin’.

Why must you remain anonymous, dream woman? Why?

Kind of disappointed that you’re beating the ‘BernieBro’ drum. It’s a convenient way for supporters of the monied centrist candidate to berate the left while pretending to be the left. I really don’t think pewdiepie420_69@verizon.net displaying a lack of civility on Twitter means much in the grand scheme of things,…

As a schlub, I speak for the entire schlub community when I say that I resent our kind being conflated with worthless pieces of freeloading trash. This is one doughy, defeated Willy Loman type who pays his own way.

Wow, HRC’s campaign has done a commendable job of steering the conversation away from her policies and towards the meanness of a couple hundred wholly insignificant Twitter users. I guess their original whisper campaign to just repeat the phrase “more electable” was running out of steam.

The only reason I’m aware of Rita Ora is this website’s continuing campaign to convince me that she doesn’t matter.

Wholly consistent with her policies brand.

Best part of all this? The linked New Times article includes a headshot of Griego... that stops just below her tits. Y’know, just so we can see what he was talking about.

‘Fear’ really isn’t the word.

I have no idea what was intended, because “judicial mansplaining” is an inherently facepalmy concept. Explain cleverness to me, dullard.

I’m glad he was found innocent - even though he seems like a toolbox - because characterizing Twitter disagreement, however uncivil, as “harassment”, when it does not include implicit or explicit threats and can be very easily blocked from one’s feed, would be a horrendous precedent. “This made me feel unsafe” is not…

“Judicial mansplaining”? Like, the judge didn’t treat the complainants as though they were fellow judges?