Two things:

Not going to disabuse you of the notion that there is any chance that this story is real. But I will suggest that maybe applying critical thinking to stories you read on the internet that seem unlikely might make you look less gullible when commenting.

Satire!

They're not impersonating either of those guys.

No. He's guilty as effing sin.

Immediately

That's in a court of law. Someone doesn't have to be found guilty to be guilty. Not being a judge or on the jury, others can look at the facts and make a judgement.

You only see the pattern you want to see. The pattern that makes you think Kinja blogs are victimizing white men. This pattern has no basis in reality.

"As long as you don't think about it at all"

Clearly VERY bored

That's what your taking away from my comment? I explained to you why it's not weird for nj.com to send a stringer.

Hooray for DVR

bmettle93 said:

No. He it's abput a ridiculous rule that deserves no respect.

He shouldn't have been suspended for testing positive for marijuana. He should have gotten a ticket if he was caught. The NCAA didn't have to suspend him.

No, it's illegal for a 19-year-old to drink alcohol. Under your logic they should be suspended. To state otherwise is hypocritical.

It's a stupid rule and he shouldn't have been suspended for it. A rule is a rule is just a stupid thing to say.

.

So if a player tests positive for alcohol they should be suspended as well?

Man, this is more attention than a Fergie performance has ever really warranted or deserved (other than the pee incident). I guess this whole weird people dancing thing was a nice piece of viral marketing.