that’s a good stat line

great example of referential restraint.

no shit. that’s why we have a system that attempst to diffuse power

from my understanding, the children representing the estate are somewhat of a mess

OOOOH YEAH!

amazing that the Hemming story originally came out during Jefferson’s life and it still scandalizes people today.

that’s alrigh, another one just comes up next, right?

i once absent mindedly caught a falling leaf. that was the look on my face

a cowboys owner thats not an asshole!?!

ahhh, i forgot about Jeremy Shockey!

oh, you dont need to be sympathetic for me, im a packer fan. but a lot of friends are vikings fans. i watched that championship game with them when favre had his final humiliation of the vikings. god, i enjoyed their pain...

a slow, awkward, but somewhat exciting race to the end of the season. fitting

yeah, but if you are a viking fan, existential dread is always just a millimeter beneath the surface

that’s actually step one in the boat turning into a giant autobot

my thesis is that anyone that doesn’t have dumb turnovers would be an upgrade

some doof that could run would be a huge upgrade

good memory

might have helped net a senator also. OH WELL!

yeah! something like that!

good, except in the sense that the implication is that there are whole swathes of men that aren’t cognizant enough of their own actions to know that there is a neutral setting in-between “inappropriate” and “cautious”