I keep tellin' you, he's 80 years old and he's dead.

I saw this in the theater. Can you imagine? The theater. And it was around this point, WHEN THE BLUES BROTHERS GET TURNED INTO ZOMBIES, that my brain broke and I started laughing hysterically at everything that happened for the rest of the movie.

Crimes and Misdemeanors is a damn masterpiece.

Chet Haze is in this? Tom Hank's wayward son?? Holy shit this just gets worse and worse

They're tricky, but I'd say Thor and Cap were way trickier.

Huge set-piece that was apparently cut. And it was the Highlight of the trailer!
That's when it's explained the Thing has had x number of "kills." Because the ever-lovin' blue-eyed Thing KILLS. That's when I knew I'd never give this film a dime.

Remember when the human torch flew past the billboard and set the Burger King Flame Broiled Whopper on fire? That was still better than this.

I'd love to see a Pixar take on the Silver Surfer story.

Yup. Set in the atomic age, when science was mysterious and freaky. Only way to make this work for today's audience. Setting FF in the 60s to me is as important as setting Captain America in the 40s. Can you imagine the FOX version of Cap? A gritty, glowering Steve Rodgers, in modern day, all tortured and anguished.

Yeah, there were like a ton of articles about this. Huge moments in the trailers that simply weren't in the movie. Like the Thing dive-bombing from a plane. It was the HIGHLIGHT of the trailer and certainly implies a huge set-piece. Not in the movie, apparently.

Exactly. There's no cornier origin than the FF's. They go into space and get hit by cosmic rays and that gives them various goofy-fun powers? Whatever. It's lightweight 4-color silliness.

Silver Surfer is underrated. That said, they're both far from perfect. One key factor BOTH versions got wrong: The FF is supposed to be the first family of Marvel Comics. Reed and Sue are mom and dad, while Jonny and Ben are the two bratty kids. For some reason, the films always wanna show the ORIGIN of them…

Zathura was bad?

Dude, Mike Epps fans LOVE Perez Hilton. I would have to assume.

Not from what I saw. Looked like he almost killed Karen in the hospital scene, the way he was blasting away in the halls. Then he threatens to kill an unarmed kindly old building manager (And fellow solider!) a few eps later. Dude just comes off like a psycho jerk.

If he just killed people who break the law, period, I'd be on-board. But he has no problem killing innocent people if that's easier. To me, that totally goes against the character. His family were innocent victims, HE was an innocent victim, that's why he hates crime and is seeking revenge. So why's he threaten to…

But violent anti-hero, even one who kills, is morally ambiguous. Crazy murder who kills innocent people is morally wrong. Therefore, Frank and Matt have nothing to clash about. Franks just another criminal for Daredevil to take down.

Exactly! And wouldn't be more fun/interesting to pick sides? Who's way is right - Matt who believes in rehabilitation or Frank who believes in punishment? Legal system vs. Street justice. Do murders DESERVE justice? Or second chances? One says no, one says yes. Which one is right?

Unhinged, I'm fine with. He should be either way. But I think violent anti-hero is more interesting than crazy murderer.

Really? See to me he seem super sloppy. Firing indiscriminately in the hospital. No mask, no stealth… surely caught on camera and in full view of dozens of witnesses. Didn't seem smart enough for the Punisher.