I mean they probably waited for it to cool down before continuing their hacking.

Easy fix: if you have a food event, just add that there’s a two drink minimum, with a menu of both non-alcoholic and alcoholic options on it to work towards that minimum.

Just awful.

How you gonna remote operate a broken down car? That’s the whole point of that notion.

Zero vs a negative is hardly encouraging in most gambling circles.

You folk never respond to actual points. It’s just, “oh you MUST be a doctor in your field,” never mind addressing any salient point brought up if it’s not in favor of our lord and savior Pylon Mosque.

Imagine a man comes up with a burger with buns using a different kind of flour, a flour that already exists but just isn’t mass marketed. He builds a company to sell the burgers with the buns made with the new flour, and then branches out into hot dog buns. And bagels. Now, his competitors also start to use the flour…

Always go for the throat.

Jeeeeeeezus how much you getting paid to shill that shit, you sycophant?

Excited to hear about it, maybe means excited to hear about the story and mess behind it? I know sometimes the development snafus make for fascinating reading when Jason is able to dig up the deets.

I also don’t see any mention of the price of the entree. Is this pub style fare where it’s a 12 dollar burger? Probably not, because I personally would comp any customer right off the bat for that if they complained to me. But if it’s a $30+ steak or whatever? Yea they’re getting a dessert.

The (new) wife and I got to try Pok Pok recently on our honeymoon to Portland. Holy smokes. Got the wings and they were, as others have said, absolutely amazing. The particular one we went to was so unassuming too.

Your ideas intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Wait so what the hell was the name of the Japanese restaurant? I would do awful things for a 60 course sushi dinner.

That’s a fine looking ham.

Oldy but goody there.

But whither Tifa?

Why not bo- wait what’s the both equivalent for three?

I, as a man who got my education* at Berkeley, agree with Berkeley math guy.

Incorrect brochacho. Even with fewer permutations, there’s no way to prove a subjective idea such as “easier” or “harder.” Factors such as speed of play, for example, could affect that. Not to mention, math and science are arguably distinct entities, and while math can be used to proof certain sciences such as…