To be fair, she was a child herself. I don't even think she ever thought it was wrong or would be considered wrong until people pointed it out after the book release.
To be fair, she was a child herself. I don't even think she ever thought it was wrong or would be considered wrong until people pointed it out after the book release.
But how to do that when someone tells you to shut up and sit on the bed and then gives you a bj? I mean, come on! That's not in any way, shape or form victimization just because the guy is older and famous.
It's a load of crap. Those girls have the ability to say no. They're making women seem like children who don't know any better, while the men have too much power over them.
Me too. Actually, I don't think she's awful. I think her belief system is very different than mine, and that's okay. I just wish she would think that way about other people's belief systems.
So, a girl who goes to sleep with a writer willingly is now a victim of sexual harassment? What a crock! This is what I hate about the new feminism. They infantalize women by making them out to be victims who don't know what to do in situations. I know strong females that are never victims. If they have sex with…
I thought it was weird that 18-year old Daniel couldn't just go by the beer. He would have been old enough to in Texas in 1980. I thought the drinking age was 18 everywhere back then.
Are there really Freddy Got Fingered fans?
The stripper montage was a set up for how Hank was going to connect Jesse (and ultimately Walt I presume) to the blue meth. It was totally necessary.
I just watched the episode last night, and am surprised it was a mystery who that voice was. I'm sure you already know since this is years later and I'm just now getting into this series, but I knew right away it had to be the guy working for Gus. So far, he and Gus are the only ones who know about the twins. Hope…
And let's hope it didn't result in more ATM's being stolen. :)
I liked it, but it was forgettable. In fact, I forgot about it until you mentioned it.
I don't have an actor I will watch even if they do a bad movie, but I do have a couple of actors who I trust to pick good roles that I know I will like every movie they do. Leonardo DiCaprio is that guy for me. I have yet to see a movie of his that I didn't like.
I didn't watch that, but I hate it when it turns out to be an inside job. Make it a show about outside factions and it would be more interesting to me. Of course, outside factions wouldn't have the ability to get something here that could blow up the entire Capitol building. Maybe the idea that the only thing that…
Except that it seems to be an inside job and the Chief of Staff picked him to be the survivor. Maybe he thinks he would just roll over and do their bidding?
You mean it's going to be right wing military people and white supremacists so they can end up demonizing the very people who would normally watch this type of show. I'll pass.
So what kind of movies do you like? This one looks good to me, but I like all kinds of movies, even saccharine bullshit. The only kind of movies I can't stand are the only kind they make these days, movies based on comic books. Yuck!
Finally, looks like a movie coming out that I can't wait to see! Lately I haven't seen a trailer for a movie that I would even want to watch for free when it comes to cable. This one looks good.
I wouldn't find it cool at all. I don't like the man as a leader, though he's not that bad of a person. I respect him as a family man, but not as the leader of the free world.
Oh, I see. JFK couldn't be cool because he was a rich white dude.
No