Place holder. we wont see what it actualy may look like tell the end of the month with the FPS showing at PAX A
Place holder. we wont see what it actualy may look like tell the end of the month with the FPS showing at PAX A
Place holder, we wont see anything close to the finished animations tell the end of the month with the showing of the FPS modual.))
most of the stuff that has to do with it being better then UE4 will be the move to 64 bit, and what there doing with the physics
this is more like cryengine 3.9+ theres alot of things that have been costom added to the cryengin for this game. one of the big things will be the move to 64 bit, thats like an extra million line's of code right there.
yeah shortly after the funding shot way up past 21 mil that time line went out the window
your the exseption. think about all the kids or young adults in school that dont have a lot of cash, or the guy who just moved out. haveing one game that last you some time means you can just relaxe and go back to it and dont have to spend more cash ((even if a small amount))
this all of this! i spent like a hole year on skyrim and enjoyed the hell out of it, why? because i had no need to move onto something ells. I might pick up the ocasinal short indi tital but i would always go back and pick up skyrim.
skyrim had a fare amount of side quest that would put some full game's to shame.
I just play them over a long perade of time, I like to make my games last. this is why i played skyrim for almost a year but only have about 150 hours in it. I enjoyed it.
a PC version Could in theory support way higher textures and polly counts, and xbox couldn't . but the game was made for and largely limited to xbox assets. yes they could have added higher texter's packs for the PC port ((bathesda did it for skyrim and cryteck did it ... eventualy.... for crysis 3)) but that would…
your not wrong. but thats largely do to the fact that the game just has shitty texter quolity and such things.
Nope. But you think what ever you like. I use to be a fanboy to its ok I understand.
I plan to enjoy both, and as good as ED is and will be its flight model prevents things like SC racing from working in ED. There Vary different game's with different development focuses. ((also ED had a big development head start :P )) ED will have a grater focus on the univers as a hole. SC will have a grater focus…
well High G suits are confimed just not in game yet
don't exists to that point in SC lore . So G-force's are still a problem. ((the tecknolagy in game can only produce up to about 1 G (same as what holds us to the earth) but it cant predict large large swings in motion and acceleration. so even in the bigger ships if the Pilot turns off G-safe so the IFCF lets him…
well there handling physics properly save that hole top speed thing, but that has more to do with fun game play and internet limitations.
realistically the combat that would take place in space could get up to such high valositys that it would need to be done by drones with computers doing all the flying, A humam…
you at lest have to put down 30 for the game. 40+ if you want in beta. And yes you will be able to get all this stuff in game with in game cash when the PU become's a thing and the Single player S42 portion of the game Give's bigger ships but just for the single player story.
parody. Lots of game's (and songs) do it.
for some people being the best around is fun. learning all there is and being excellent at your hobby is fun.
How deep dose this rabbit hole go Gameovergate.