chris13pdx
CrispyDX
chris13pdx

Sorry not sorry

Rich guy Bradley has a backyard. Lives next to fancy Kristen.

In the 40+ years I’ve been a homeowner, I’ve owned 5 pickups. Two B-series Mazdas (when they were Mazdas), one Hardbody Nissan and two Tacomas.

With their willingness to work for exposure, and their desire to put every single thing on a gig economy basis, we can start with basic employment.

You are right and you should say it.

You wanna see cranky? Seek out a Gen-Xer, neither the youngs nor the olds but bitter and angry as fucking hell. And rightly so, the olds stole most of their stuff first, and the youngs are ripping out the last few bits of it they have left because they think they are sticking it to the boomers by doing so. And too

This guy may very well have Lowest Common Denominator Syndrome.

we have no idea what an upper limit to possible population is, nor do we have any real benchmark to judge it off of.

Overpopulation is kind of the root of all environmental issues. We could pollute a lot if there were not 8 billion of us. I will stop before I sound totally Thanos.

Get one of these with that sweet mid gate:

I hate it.  But I’ll get used to it.  In fact, it’s sort of an improvement.  Actually I prefer it.  The next one after this will be terrible, surely.

THANK YOU. The whole point of a logo is it’s a consistent factor for me to associate your brand with. Changing it up for no particular reason does the exact opposite of its intended purpose.

Everything is going flat again and retro-simple. Go back to the 1963 version - no need to reinvent the wheel. Losing the black ring gives the logo less impact. This is just change for change’s sake and not for any good reason. Just read that stupid PR-quote to confirm that. Of course all the German cars I buy are 20+

I don’t get why logos are “due for updates” anyway. Unless there’s a fundamental shift in the business that muddles the logo’s message or they used some very period-specific styling in the first place, there’s no need to change something that currently works. It only makes sense when there’s a functional issue to be

Exactly. Who buys a car for having kids in 5 years. Fucking weirdo. Probably irons his socks.

This is the boring, correct answer.

Am I the only one who thinks this person’s premise is a joke? He misses the sportiness of a 2006 V6 Mustang? Well that’d be easy to beat in this day and age.

He needs two cars, a miata and a minivan. For $35 large you can easily get both.

Can’t go wrong with the Ridge. It’s the best vehicle for people that want a truck but don’t really need one. It’s the closest thing to an “ute”.