wow.

i don't see how under the pink is better than little earthquakes.

saw them in 2011 for the reflections show (first 3 albums plus b-sides plus ??) and they played for 3 and half hours, and forty-eight (48) songs.

i know it's horribly shallow and all, but i think she's pretty decidedly unattractive. i remember a pub pic from "the princess diaries" with her, anne hathaway and (gulp) mandy moore all in school uniforms, and i felt bad for her because the outfits were, well, uniform, so all you saw was these two very pretty faces…

vs.
vitalogy
yield
ten

took me a legit second to get that you meant "encored" lol.

a thoughtful, succinct, and, perhaps most importantly, respectful—of an
artist who seemed to get more and more shit throughout her career when
all she ever really tried to do was be herself—piece, on a record i
never fully embraced, one that seems as 'on-paper'-interesting as is
suggested here but which failed to…

THIS IS NOT RUH-VUE! OH NEVER WAS RUH-VUE! FUCK YOOOU!!

lgm!

yep. not my usual "type", but wow-gorgeous. i could always see it coming with her.

did you log in just to join decal_12 on my sack, dan?

all these concerts were blur? even oasis gigs?

the cure.

wrong answer. really very wrong.

"x miles of bad road" is a stock phrase.

(mellon collie and the infinite sadness — i generally separate instrumentals as unparallel to vocal/lyric songs..but it's gorgeous)
thru the eyes of ruby
muzzle
here is no why
galapagos
cupid de locke
thirty-three
farewell and goodnight
beautiful
jellybelly
porcelina of the vast oceans
in the arms of sleep
stumbleine
1979
tonight,…

he's a fucking musical genius, while she's..yeah.

my top 10 (right now)

second side of machina is rife with weighty but great songs (wound, blue skies bring tears, age of innocence, imploding voice, half of glass and the ghost children, with every light).

what's to not like about "1979"?