chocolatesystems
chocolatesystems
chocolatesystems

Yes, my issue is more with the way these people (at least the ones in my personal network) tend to snidely infer that Jill Stein is a somehow superior candidate, WHICH SHE IS NOT.

I don’t care what you say to your Pro-Trump friends.

I feel you. I live in NYC and I still am a little bit nervous walking around with my Hillary button. There aren’t a lot of Trump supporters around here but they will apparently literally set you on fire.

Point of clarity: by neither one, I meant Stein or Johnson

I just want to be like oh cool, so if you vote for Stein, and Trump somehow wins, your conscience will feel great?

Jill Stein is not the solution to your issues with Clinton. Get involved with local politics.

There are a zillion good reasons why neither one of these people should be president, but it’s not gonna work on anyone who wants to say shit like “I live in a solidly blue state, so I have the luxury of voting with my conscience and choosing the candidate I think is best fit for the job, and that’s Dr. Stein.”

I really wonder how the GOP would do with the electorate if they abandoned all of their anti-abortion anti-rights positions and only worked their economic positions for an election cycle. Where would the crazies go if they didn’t have anyone catering to the pro-bigotry demo? Granted, many of their economic positions

Don’t you think we’re there? Or nearly there?

I’m getting so stressed out because what is the solution to this? Conspiracy theories like this are protected under free speech but at some point it has to escalate into yelling “fire!” in a crowded theater territory, doesn’t it? But how would any form of attempting to remove these people from the public eye do

My mom has always hated Giuliani. Growing up I remember she had an article from the NY Times hanging on the front door where they were writing about some ridiculous policy he’d proposed and “subtly” editorialized by including a picture of him dressed as a clown at a promotional event for the big apple circus.

The affidavit was given to Paula Jones’ lawyer, not Bill Clinton’s.

And do you feel that Juanita Broaddrick’s sworn affidavit that Bill Clinton never touched her also completely negates her accusations?

I’m so confused by the drug test thing. People say that all of Trump’s nonsense is just projection, perhaps this is just the clearest example of that yet?

I completely don’t understand how he could be involved in this. Is he supposed to be paying the women to lie? Wearing various wigs and making the reports himself?

“Do you guys have a plug please?” - Donald Trump’s new campaign slogan

No, that is not what I said at all. My comment was that if he thinks he doesn’t know any men who would talk this way or behave this way, he is oblivious. That doesn’t at all suggest that every many sexually harasses/assaults women.

I am not trying to offend you, but you are oblivious. It’s okay. Lots of men are. The important thing is what you do from this point forward.

I have zero interest in looking into this Lena Dunham interview, but I’m pretty sure Lenny Kravitz is not a teenager.