You know what, I'll get into the the meaning of stealing because when I buy content, I don't own it, I just have the right to use the content.

I will assume that ultrabooks come with integrated graphics only. If this is the case, then Ivy Bridge is a big upgrade. However if you use distinct graphics card then there's really no other relevance besides that Ivy Bridge consumes less energy which for a mobile device of course is a good thing.

Aand this is why I don't use iOS devices.

When I read the title of the article, I thought the tax rate would be much higher and 25% doesn't sound bad at all.

Funny thing is, when I tried the beta it didn't feel enough Diablo for me.

I wouldn't be so sure. If Apple opened iOS for non-Apple products, it would be a real threat to Android and other competition.

This is one of the main things that I truly despise about most modern digital distributions. I thought one of the great things about digital age was to be able to provide material to a wider audience with no geographical limits. And whatever your opinion is about piracy, this must be one of the few positives sides of…

Being the worst game ever must be worth something.. right?

Gawker is implementing new comment system and the down time for comments section is taking longer than first anticipated.

whoops, delete this pelase

What kind of logic is that? I could just as well say that Notch isn't for the money because he's not trying to appeal to the masses by making a pretty looking game.

That term paper is a bad analogy. What you're describing in plagiarizing. More accurate would be to say that if I find almost fully developed software and I steal it, claim it myself and profit from it myself - that would be a more accurate than what you're saying.