They do it to make the arch look higher and the fat-ass beltline look lower.
They do it to make the arch look higher and the fat-ass beltline look lower.
For me it’s the flat side arch of the wheel wells of damn near every modern car. Why are there so many different cars from every manufacturer that have that design element? I really don’t get it.
We should all know that Rossi on Stoner is the best Laguna Seca pass of all time.
I’ll even take it a step further: modern cars are too fast and too powerful for 99% of what enthusiasts do.
I think modern cars are too fast and powerful for 99% of what most people do.
When Formula One switched to a smaller, quieter engine, many fans reacted as if they had just switched to spec…
Posts like this made me want to up my automotive photography. Last weekend I went to the British Car Festival outside of Chicago and this is what I got.
His most successful tunnelling endeavour to date
The wheeled, rounded-rectangular volumes of space enclosed by a metal shell and propelled by a small engine at one…
I Was 7th!...I thought this was the greatest ‘track’ video...
i’ll 2nd that
To be sure, those of us of a certain age, I’m 62, were listening to this way back in the 70's. As you point out, to get these things to work meant you were always on boost, and when you weren’t the low compression ratios meant crappy throttle response and economy.
Sounds mean? Maybe you and I are working from a different reference point.
Really Flat out in a 917.... Posts a video of a 936 from 1977.