cheesel
cheesel
cheesel

You should probably leave.

Is that kid dressed like a Hasidic JewCPI can't tell if that's racist or not.

This is terrible. It isn't well written at all. Meh.

Can you explain the pun?

In sheer business sense this is an awful idea. Not sure if the creators understand how expensive it is to exhibit at a tradeshow. 1k to have a booth at pax is a complete steal.

I bet you're really fun at parties and have a ton of friends.

That's a very mature sentiment

A port would take them all of like 3 days. VC ports are just fancy emulated games / Cash cows. I think they're probably pretty serious about the connectivity thing.

Literally the indie game in question that this blog post is referencing is published directly by Microsoft.

I have no idea what you're talking about, but this is complete baseless speculation. Game blog comments are the worst.

No one uses playstation's eye because it's an inferior product.

Are you joking? You think a hardware manufacturer would come up with a deeply unpopular DRM system on the off chance that the executive of a publisher (5 months away from the debut of these next gen systems BTW) would suddenly decide to cancel projects that would have been in the works for at least 3-4 months prior?

PS4 + their webcam thing = 460$, that's the baseline in my opinion. The fundamental systems (DRM and the like) have been reported - it's absurd that commenters are going to ignore what looks like a fantastic, beautiful game is going to turn in to OMG MICROSOFT MAKES ME HAVE A MODERN INTERNET CONNECTION. Personally,

Holy shit man get over it. Let's just let the gaming news stuff roll in and discuss games on their merits, vs turning everything in to OMG PS3 IS 40$ CHEAPER white noise bullshit? Kotaku's comments were already the worst. You guys are just making it even more terrible.

That's completely absurd.

Where do you live?

Agreed. I don't think Patricia came off that way at all. Good to keep these guys (and girls) on their toes. Gaming press gets way too complacent which is sort of what my original comment was about.

Exactly the way I read it too. In all honesty that joke is handled way more deftly than most 70s - 80s movies approach homosexuality.

Before everyone says you're overreacting and all that I just want to say this is a great article. Kudos for challenging the creative director on this - I think the argument "well we have a gay guy on the team" might not stick, exactly, it definitely helps you understand his / their team's mindset.

That's fantastic.