chargernj
chargernj
chargernj

It says people understand the context of the flag and what it represents. Except for perhaps historical reenactments there really is no need to display that particular symbol. This article would not qualify.

You’re an anti-Semite because even after being corrected you stated that you were going to continue to believe it because it amused you to do so.

It’s not because you find humor in the idea of a “dick sticking through a bedsheet”. That’s fine

What offensive is that you have stated your intent to continue believing and

It’s because the poster said he believed a thing that was not true and even after he was corrected he stated that he will continue to believe it merely because it amuses him to do so. Thus he has actively chosen to embrace a belief that most people would say cast Orthodox Jews in an unflattering light.

Any cop that won’t respond because “it’s too dangerous” shouldn’t be a cop.

Next time ask for the Blonde roast, it’s not as roasted and was created specifically to address the taste of customers who think their regular roast (Pikes Peak) taste burnt. When I’m at a Starbucks that’s usually what I order. Also, If your just ordering a simple cup of coffee at Starbucks, it’s not what most people

True story, when I was 24 I punched a 16 year old boy in the face and broke his nose. Why you ask, the kid was the cousin of my wife and he was a total piece of shit. He was yelling at his elderly grandmother who was also a stroke survivor. I finally lost my temper when the kid threw a glass Snapple bottle at the

Would you crawl under peoples houses if they constantly told you that you should be killed or enslaved? Because that’s the message a Confederate flag sends to people who are not white christian males.

So yeah, maybe if more people stood on principle and refused to do business with racist (which would mean not

I’ll wait as you produce the scientific peer reviewed study that proves your point.

Unfortunately, most heroes of Texas were themselves racist. Sam Houston, William B. Travis, James Bowie, & Stephen F. Austin were a bunch of guys who rebelled against the legitimate government of the time (Mexico) because they were pissed off that Mexico didn’t allow them to keep their slaves.

Also, way to miss the

So your saying you can’t image why people would feel uncomfortable going to the door of a home festooned with symbols of racism and xenophobia, even if just to deliver a package?

We both agree, that as you put it, “the government is not taking away funds from the military for other things”.

Then you go on to explain why you think they should make an exception to that rule and take away funding for this particular thing that they are already funding?

Your opinion appears to be based on how you

Funny how the military has trillions to fund figher jets that don’t fly in the rain but have to look under the couch cushions for funding to provide medical care to our military, regardless of why they need treatment. We have the money, it’s a matter of priorities.

Of course then you trot out the old “research has

That’s an impressive word salad you threw together there. Triggered much?I don’t think you understand what the word “scientifically”actually means.

um, the fact that the military screwed you is not an argument that others should be told to fuck off. Your condition should be covered too.

Slippery slope arguments are bullshit. Where is the line? I don’t know. But we don’t need to know where the line is to know that we haven’t reached it yet.

Ok, I see what you’re getting at now.

I don’t think most of us would say there was no risk at all, even with insurance and tax write offs and so on. All people were doing was saying the dealership was wrong, period. When you balance all factors, morality vs financial vs whatever else you want to consider, the dealer was still in the wrong. He took

Monetary loss is only one kind of loss. The hit to their reputation and the resultant lost business may well end up costing more. I’m not an idiot, I do realize a tax write off isn’t 1:1. I’m simply saying that an ethical business owner would have accepted the risk of loss as a cost of doing business but as I

I disagree, let’s compare alt-right douchbags to 3 year old children. Similar mindset, similar intelligence, similar desire to push boundaries. If child#1 is wailing on child#2 with a toy sword to the point that it makes the other childchild#2 cry, you take away the toy sword.

Now child#1 then picks up another toy and

Which they then write off for tax purposes. Just tell the truth, you think that the needs of business owners should come before the needs of individual citizens. It’s easier than arguing with you.