chappers
Chappy
chappers

Gita your articles are always well written and your ideas well fleshed out. As a white male I like to think I’ve learned a good deal from your writing on Kotaku. I agree wholeheartedly that we need to be open to the idea that even our most loved games can be improved.

R/hockey dubbed them the Rain City Bitch Pigeons and now there can’t be another answer. They even have a logo:

This is not “under $100 for the first time ever.” I know this because I bought it last time you posted about it being under $100.

This is not “under $100 for the first time ever.” I know this because I bought it last time you posted about it

I played goal in both hockey and soccer. While the positions are very different they share the same goal: get between the ball/puck and the goal. Hockey has so many desperation moments that force you to shoot your closest limb out to the puck, including many, many kick saves. I don’t know why anybody would frown on a

Minnesotan here with some advice: dig first, use momentum, and don’t spin the wheels. Moving before digging just creates bigger holes and puts more snow in harder to reach places. Rocking the car back and forth or getting even a little run before hitting the snow will do you wonders. Spinning the wheels digs them down

Bullshit. Anybody who loves their car is a car enthusiast. Yes, even *that* car.

The BR being the standard weapon was a blessing. Spawning with a BR meant that every player had killing power.This means that when an opponent has a sniper you have a chance; the sniper still has better odds (in a pro’s hands, not in mine) against a BR, but it’s far less lopsided than it would be against an AR.

The “sell” part of it.

Tiny is, of course, relative. It’s likely one of the more cramped cars you could buy in the late 2000s. Of course it’s not as small as a Beat or the Z3M, but it’s noticeably smaller inside than my 987 Cayman, which has 3 inches less between the wheels (But 10 more inches overall). For a typical American driver, it’s

Tiny little bastards, but they’re tons of fun. They are natural competitors for the Bosxter/Cayman of the time, but they have a more cramped cabin and ride harsher. The Z4M feels far faster, but I guess that will happen when you have an extra 50 or 90 hp vs the 987 Cayman S or base, respectively. The engine in the Z4M

Tiny little bastards, but they’re tons of fun. They are natural competitors for the Bosxter/Cayman of the time, but they have a more cramped cabin and ride harsher. The Z4M feels far faster, but I guess that will happen when you have an extra 50 or 90 hp vs the 987 Cayman S or base, respectively. The engine in the Z4M

I bought an Amazon TV on Prime Day this year. I know your pain.

I’m betting on the “mid-engine Cadillac based off the C8.” It’s a way to spread out the development costs of what has likely been an extremely expensive project. And like the article mentioned, Chevy is no stranger to badge engineering.

I’m surprised with the negativity coming back from my comment. My point was simply that OP claimed there weren’t ANY beautiful supercars being made. I made a list that should have at least one car that most people could agree to, although I specifically omitted anything with crazy aero because of OP’s point against

I will call you crazy. Though I can’t say all of those are “beautiful,” I tried to give you enough to find at least one stunner among them. However, I have to agree that the F-Type is very, very attractive. 

What Halloween candy was an automatic trade for you? And on the other side, what candy you were always trying to get more of?

Are you trying to tell me there aren’t any beautiful supercars right now?

Even better would be the punishments. Didn’t meet the minimum weight? One of your drivers races in a fat suit.