I agree on both counts. The first game's only redeeming factor was slowly unlocking each new tool/ability but even that couldn't combat the decreasingly entertaining levels or boring plot development. The 2nd game definitely had a better development cycle and more to offer, and I did get farther into the 2nd game…

No worries, no offense taken.

While I agree that's a valid definition of the term, I don't agree it applies to my comment because I never had the "aim of inciting an angry response."

So are the L1/R1 inputs also triggers? And were the Dualshock 1 and 2 L2/R2 inputs also triggers?

The only wrong way to hold a controller...

I'm not denying that he's done a good job playing serious parts in the past, but it seems like a drop in the bucket now after years of comedic roles. Has he done anything recently in a more serious nature?

The face buttons were never part of this discussion, so I don't understand why you keep bringing it up unless your point is that just because the thumb manages the face buttons, dpad, and analogs that only the index can manage the shoulder buttons too? I'm not saying you HAVE to have 2 fingers because there are 2…

I don't know... I associate Baldwin too much to 30 Rock's Jack Donaghy or the Capitol One spokesperson to see him in a serious role anymore. Anything close just comes off now as him doing a sketch on SNL... just waiting for a punchline.

So what you're saying is that unless my opinions are purely positive and in-line with the tone of the article that I can't express an opinion? And that humor of any kind can only be used in the same said positive manner?

I guess we'll have agree to disagree. I refuse to accept that providing a civil, rational, and non-hostile (albeit opinionated) answer to my interpretation of a question in an article (which while entirely within the context of the article) is somehow wrong, not allowed, or trolling because you don't agree with it or…

No worries. Kotaku's layout plays tricks on the eyes.

Now you're defining the question's "implication"? I'm sorry, but you're just grasping at straws.

You seem to think my definition of the grip involves the Middle finger being the primary finger. I feel like I'm on a loop, but I'll try to say this one more time: I AGREE WITH YOU... the index finger is primary finger used for just about everything from guns, to mice, to old controllers. The only time the middle…

I don't understand how expressing dislike for something ultimately equates to trolling. Was it the playful "/snap" at the end? Was that where I crossed the line?

The article's title is a question. That alone is an invitation for comment and discussion.

I just don't understand your comparison and quite frankly am beginning to think you either don't understand this conversation either. A gun only has 1 trigger... 1 active input (not counting the manually using the hammer). No one in their right mind (unless they have an injured or disabled index) would use the middle…

Because it's called a discussion. Maybe someone out there has an interesting perspective or opinion on the game that they could share. Maybe others feel the same and also want to comment. Maybe because people like you also feel like wasting time posting reactionary memes to things or comments they don't like or…

Actually the index finger is usually a person strongest and most dextile finger outside the thumb. So there is a definitive reason...

I can wait all night and all day. In fact I can wait forever!

There's no definitive reason why a should button or trigger has to be pushed by an index finger other than it conflicting with the ergonomics of the controller.