chalkshark
chalkshark
chalkshark

Well, you're clearly wrestling with some issues here, Ms. Woerner, but I'm not going to be the one to help you through them. I think this is just going to have to work itself out.

Old School insanity. Utilizing Kryptonian technology, Batman evolves himself & then, in a fit of jealousy, devolves Superman. You just can't leave those two alone for a minute, without something terrible happening.

I can hear the pitch now... "It's like Titanic meets Open Water... during World War II!"

As would I. I notice that suddenly I can see my images. What the heck is going on around here? Anyway, to some degree, the Hawks have always been defined by their marriage. It's an integral part of their characters. The marriage of Lois & Clark had a certain inevitability to it, but sometimes I think the writer's just

I don't know why my image won't load. It's a picture of Hawk Man & Hawk Girl. I would try to submit Buddy & Ellen Baker, as well, but if I can't load an image, what's the point.

There should have been a spot on the list for them. Not only is there love for one another eternal, but they've been a married couple throughout many diverse eras in history.

Julian Sands had a pretty out there role as the clone of Jor-El.

Does Wonder Woman have to take off her pants in order to defeat Veronica Cale? What kind of final confrontation is this going to be?

You're not allowed to forget Nuclear Man. If I have to suffer for the memory, than so does everyone else.

That's Ram, of the New Gaurdians, isn't it? I had completely forgotten the existence of those characters. I'd really like to keep it that way, so I'm not going to click on your links. Somethings are better left unknown.

That's some seriously brutal anatomy on that figure work. I'm all for Kirby-esque exaggeration but that just looks unrefined. Based on that sample artwork, there's no way I'd pick this book up.

This is the world that's coming, isn't it?

Star Trek: First Contact was extremely well received by the critics & the fan base. It opened in theaters while both Star Trek: Deep Space Nine & Star Trek: Voyager were on the air. The failure of Star Trek: Nemesis has nothing to do with a watering down of the brand & everything to do with the fact that it was a

Which is very black & white, & what would be expected from a conscientious person. It's the term "possibly" that kind of grays the issue. I hope you don't think I was calling you out on it. I was just amused.

They have to leave something to the imagination to get you to come to the theater.

Either that or IO9 figures that there's so much disinterest in seeing Dunst's nude form, that it just won't register to people that they have. I was a bit surprised, as I didn't think she did on-screen nudity. Apparently, Von Trier is the new Robert Altman, with the power to compel any actress to disrobe for his films.

I have seen it. It's a brilliant film, marred only by the early exit of Julianne Moore's character. Love her! Children of Men was not one of the four films that I hadn't seen.

Um... why are we not sure about Dunst's nudity being unsafe for viewing? I thought any nudity, at least in America, was always to be regarded as dangerous. Would if be more, or less, safe with a different actress?

Well, there are four films on this list I've never seen, but I will say this about Batman. It's a terrible film. There are Bat Cave sized plot holes running throughout the film. It suffers from particularly bad editing. It's too dark. I don't mean thematically. It's literally too dark. I've seen better lighting in

They should have cast Miley Cyrus just to screw with people. Looking forward to catching this with my crew on Tuesday.