cfm54345
CFM54345
cfm54345

I didn't need to read the article...because I watched the game. All I did was comment on my rooting interests and why they are what they are. It's not my fault you took offense to it because you're a Clippers "fan." Which, as I said earlier, doesn't really exist outside of about 4,000 people.

I didn't bring it up, Anderson Cooper did with the 4000th promo for his interview which wouldn't matter half as much if the Clippers weren't still going.

You obviously didn't watch the game . Westbrook was big late in the 4th when Durant disappeared. Why isn'tDurant taking any heat for the three turnovers?

Am I the only one actively rooting against the Clippers? I'm so sick of this narrative, like we're supposed to rally behind them because their owner is a senile racist. Do we really feel bad that poor Doc Rivers making 7 million a year has to be asked stupid questions about his dirtbag owner? It's not like someone

Gotta love the dopes blaming Westbrook for this. These are the same "geniuses" who would have cheered him if it had gone in.

Not to be a jerk, but the language isn't defined by what you personally think. Look up the definition if you find a word usage not fitting with your concept of it. Could be that your concept, and not the usage, is the failing.

Did that sound funny in your head? I'm not seeing it.

But don't white feminists do this same thing when called on their bullshit? I don't understand making fun of someone for doing something that you do yourself.

Any time somebody makes a broad generalized statement of ANY group, without qualifiers, expect someone who doesn't wish to partake in thoughtless binaries to answer with "Not all..." That's life on Planet Earth.

Yes, the Protective Knights of Male Whitedom are annoying, but most people who are intelligent would rather

This is what happens when internet feminists attempt humor.

I don't see the point of stuff like this. It's just divisive and nothing more.