Eh, I dunno. I thought he had a point.

Hey, no kidding. That's cool.

Chicken parm isn't vegan?

Was it that New Yorker piece? Because is so, you left "enraging" and "nauseating" out of there.

Watch them get another Nobel Peace Prize just for not being their predecessor.

"Works tirelessly" isn't exactly an unflattering take on a politician.

And suspicious enough about what Polanski was up to to bang on the locked door. :(

He got permission from her mother to do a private photoshoot with her. It's not like he ran into her by accident.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT YELLING!

"so-called" president.

Heh. With a star-studded cast like that, it's hard not to refer to the characters by their extremely famous actor names.

a 3-D nationalist fantasy that follows two smelly medieval Europeans as
they trek East with the plan of stealing the secret of gunpowder,

I feel similarly about We Bought a Zoo. Except no one likes that movie, so I never actually have to argue about it.

Actually, the split screens were one of my biggest problems with it. I know Ang Lee was trying to use the visual tools of comics books on the screen, but all he did was demonstrate that he fundamentally doesn't understand the language of comics. I respect his ambition, but the movie's a disaster.

Every time I read one of these "Mike's the worst because he didn't like the long take in Children of Men" comments here, I roll my eyes.

I keep debating whether I should watch this movie so I have a point of reference (it does seem to come up an awful lot) or not, because I'm pretty sure I'll hate it.

It sucked.

Same. I simultaneously enjoy it unironically and wince frequently when I watch it. I'm not sure exactly how that works, but that's what happens.

Are you thinking of Ang Lee's Sense and Sensibility? I don't remember Emma Thompson ever starring in an adaptation of Pride and Prejudice.

We're all going to die.