Yeah! Stop talking about a thing that people like!

The Inhumans were never designed to be super heroes! They were designed to be weird Fantastic Four (and, to a lesser extent, Avengers) supporting characters. Their role for about the first forty years of their existence was primarily to be among the large number of weird and off-putting people from weird places that…

I feel rather perplexed about Inhumans as a whole. I mean, going beyond the show’s obvious, myriad flaws. But the concept of Inhumans just eludes me.

I think the blame rest on both genders. I read an interesting story in Time last week that younger people are looking for a lot more in marriage, someone who is going to be like their coach and cheerleader, best friend, sexy hot lover, and bring out the best in them. At the same time, those same people report being…

Man, that movie really got him worked up. All his speeches about how he created Sarah Connor, so we’re good for female heroes. It’s kind of embarrassing, really.

I’m hoping they continue using Kate as Sessions. It’s an accurate impression & capture the whole racist-Southern-elf vibe he has going on

Eh, I think all the hate for his work is a bit silly at this point. Yes, Batman V Superman was poorly written drek, and Suicide Squad was a hack job, but he did a solid job on most of his other projects.

“What exactly is the writer of the post asking for?”

Yep. The last time this issue was discussed the writer did the same thing, and the commenters all pointed out that he addressed the allegations directly.

This is true, but personally the greater issue is that this is something that’s been following him for some time, largely thanks to Gawker. There’s never been a single allegation plead with specificity, and the alleged victim(s?) have all actively denied that it was him in the rumors. As someone on another post…

Not true, at least for me. I’d be uncomfortable condemning anyone if the only evidence of wrongdoing was second and third-hand rumors, and if the supposed sources of those accusations started directly refuting them.

In an interview with the New York Times on September 11, Louis C.K. declined to discuss

This is getting boring and a little gross. It’s reminding me of the call for unedited photos of Lena Dunham – skeevy and not what I’d expect from this site.

Um...I’m an agnostic/atheistish kinda person and I think most religions sound a little nutty when you really think about what its followers believe (virgin birth, son of god being basically a zombie, etc.)...but the fact that she put Scientology in the list with those others is all the confirmation I need that she’s…

Seems like the root is becoming more and more anti black male. Very sad. It sucks they are joining the other Gawkmondo properties in creating a white friendly version of progressiveness that’s easy to gluten-sensitive white digestive tracks because we can still hate black men and be woke.

The unfortunate truth is that hate groups thrive on this sort of mentality.

Seems like you haven’t been there lately.

So Smith has more then four movies, ay?

But now it’s 2017 - sadness and misery are back and better than ever!

Say what you want about homeboy’s complete lack of basic self-preservation instincts, but he fucking stuck that landing.