The outfits are designed by Japanese company Roen, who also use red soles as a trademark.

I agree with you that they SHOULDNT be held accountable. I don't believe thats how it would play out in practice, however. Just look at how the media has responded thus far. They've essentially tarred and feathered the company several times over. Sony is the villain in the media's narrative, no one is doing that…

And if something had happened, like a physical attack or (more likely) a cyber attack on theaters, who is responsible? Who is LIABLE? It's easy to scream about free expression when you have none of those concerns to contend with.

Northern European men are always youtube/instagram/snapchat stars. The blonde hair and light eyes mesmerize tweens.

He's famous because he entertains millions of people.

To be fair, most CEOs don't know much about IT security (much less their own passwords); that kind of stuff is for the CTO.

Because it would actually read: "American under-classes revolt and install themselves as yet another kleptocratic regime claiming to rule in the name of "representative democracy". Four legs good, two legs better...

watch some anime, that's the plot of countless series and OVAs since the 70's

Brass has similar properties, which is one of the reasons most public bathroom door hardware is brass.

Ozymondias from Watchman totally subverts the super-villain stereotypes by revealing his plan to the heroes after he already carried it out.

As is the fashion in Korea, this Tiger was a bear before all the surgery.

Update: I just got around to listening to Pentatronix, and I am now deeply upset by this a cappella bullshit.

I think that one guy is a fairly experienced gamer kid. To be fair, the games have manuals with them. That's why you should read them before playing.

I realize that you're kinda backed into a corner and I don't expect you to concede, but just to reiterate — I'm talking about the nature of the criminal act, not how it can be defined under a specific law in a specific time and place. Yes, "hate crime" is a legal construct. And because laws vary by place and time, in…

Yeah, my argument is that it's a hate crime. I'm not trying to prove that current laws would recognize it as such — I'm talking about what it actually is. You do realize that laws are built around the real world and not the other way around, right? Hate crime has a specific legal definition, yes, but as a tool for how…

Oh please... if these people were targeted because they were furries, it's a hate crime. Even IF you can successfully argue that the legal definition doesn't cover furries, your point had better be that the legal definition is insufficient.

The main point here is cross-platform play between PC and console, which Microsoft don't allow. So SFV is not coming to Xbox the same reason as FF14, Microsoft's closed system policy.

Maybe I'm just cynical, but I won't enjoy Bruno Mars until he stops trying to be Michael Jackson.

just like real life. If i'm in a fantasy world, i should have the most glorious spectacular buttocks imaginable. Just like this guy...