Monsanto is evil. Them killing bees or not wouldn't change that.
Monsanto is evil. Them killing bees or not wouldn't change that.
Exactly, it's never a single cause alone. But I still believe that the pesticide used by Monsanto is still the primary cause, if not the only.
I can't tell if you're trolling or being sincere in your comment. Honestly.
trolling? or just joking?
Well, except for Netflix. I agree with you on all the other counts.
"there's not really a better alternative"
Yes, you're missing the gun in his hand that he is very plainly and clearly pointing towards the "zombie" thinking whether or not to pull the trigger.
I've never watched Law and Order, but yes it is more like the diner episode, but that still has to do with ascension in the end.
Is anyone really surprised?
So in other words, in a new show, new premise, the character Michael Shanks plays ascends once again.
3D is awesome.
I agree. Google+ is much more than a Facebook clone. There's more to it, it's not like the personal-public diary that everyone seems to use Facebook for.
Looks like the ending scene from SpaceBalls. "I see your shwartz is as big as mine!"
The person may be a really great a fun person to hang out with IRL, but doesn't understand what's ok and not ok to share online. You know, like the new mom that posts 10,000 pictures of their new born baby still covered in birthing fluids. And then every single day after that for the next 6 months over 30+ posts a day…
Gee, IDK. Maybe because Twitter is now a modern form of communication that actually has meaningful content being distributed by almost every person and company around the world. But other than that, I can't think of a reason. If you simply see twitter as a "waste of time" then you're either 50 years older than an…
If only....
True enough. But there is a difference on Facebook between "just found out I'm going to be a mom!" and "going for a run".
Personally, sure. I like that also. But in a "broadcast" form, it's meaningless.
"Good morning, Twitter!"