The main problem of the GT90 though is that they melted. 4 turbos is a bit much if I'm honest.

Well from what I remember Kyle pushed Kevin's car out of the way.

they won in a water cooled car, just like they had done for the last 15 years before that

90's 911 GT2?

the MP4-4 seems to disagree

how a Le Mans engine could win in 92-93 and then be so unreliable is beyond me

last year the FW34 was a huge step forward. The FW35 though.....

Well the Honda V8 had all of it's power come in a big high RPM lump and was nigh on undrivable so engines do matter.

And those 4 years were some of the most dominate in F1 history

Guys this car isn't even the real spec W02. This car was a late test car for the 2012 exhaust regs. So there is no blown diffuser and the car would have been really unstable. So, no hot lap.

the car's suspension was solid, so a little overkill on Ferrari's part, even though the car was insane through the corners it still had to be a road car.

The US McLaren F1 had only 1 seat due to the side seats not having air bags. So a regular US McLaren counts. Also, that GTR I believe has the left seat intact, but like the LM it's a seat molded into the floor, not an actually a separate seat. BTW PAPAYA ORANGE FTW!

yeah well the F50 might have over done it a little in that regard. Still one of my favorite cars ever though

and it sounds the business. The only thing, is that you won't have a spine for very long if you drive it on the road.

627 vs. 680 in the LM so yeah. Apparently the BMW engineers had an engine going over 1000hp at 10,000rpm but Gordon Murray didn't want them to add weight to the V12 to make it strong enough to handle it.

I love the Ferrari but.... oh god the name is awful. Plus not burning it would only delay the inevitable.

well hello Jeremy Clarkson

Senna Vs. Prost?

1500 HP anyone?

Vote #2: The Novi Indy engine