Geez louise. I said just a thought.

These constant think pieces claiming all her attention-seeking antics are empowering and feminist are to blame, in my opinion. If she had never become famous, she’d be a random valley girl who works at her boutique with her sisters and only talks about gossip or how fat they’re feeling that particular day.

Could this divide just generational? My mother (early 60-something) taught me (early 30-something) about feminism from an early age—and her perspective on this (being overtly sexual) is exactly the same as Sharon’s. My thought is that when you came of age in a time when you were expected to be sexual (but nice, pliant…

She is definitely not a WASP:

Jsyk, folks, the person these people are referencing is Omar Khadr, a child soldier from Canada, who was captured at age fifteen during the illegal invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, tortured and imprisoned in the infamous Guantanamo Bay prison, during which Canada did nothing to help him, and then illegally imprisoned…

Yeah, i had a roommate from Chicago who was in high school in the late 90's/early 2000's. She said that he would come to all the girls high school basketball games by himself and try to pick up the girls afterward.

I flagged that comment too. I’m a little disturbed that it’s still there 3 hours later.

I used to work with a woman who went to high school in Detroit during the 90s (I think at the Detroit School of Arts) who said that Kelly would come in every year and check out student musical performances and meet/‘mentor’ young artists there...

He told another commenter to look in the mirror and slice her throat with scissors. How the fuck has Jez not removed him? I’ve flagged him.

Yeah, it brings into question just how independent and free she actually may have been. I said to another commentator this chick is either fooling herself and rewriting history or she was a full participant.

PSA: Please upvote so this gets to the top!

It seems as though Kim has some issues of her own, although that’s no excuse for being complicit. If your date kicks you - fucking kicks you- for checking out another woman’s awesome dress and your response is anything other than throwing your drink in their face and getting the fuck out of there, I’m going to assume…

Fuck, that shit’s gonna get hacked if it is on iCloud.

Yep! Someone somewhere learned their lesson...probably not R. Kelly himself, but whoever provides the girls for him. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find that there is someone whose job it is to keep this all on this side of legal.

He’s literally walking on the wall between legal and pedo. He did the research. It’s like he waits the second after midnight when they turn legal age of consent whether it be 16, 17 or 18. Seems like he is really into that whole DD/LG scene while actively searching for the youngest looking girls that again are LEGAL.

It always make my skin crawl how many women, black women too, are willing to cape for him. There’s always at least one, “Well they knew what they were getting into” or “They’re old enough to make their choices” or “They can leave if they want, they just like the money/attention/whatever else” comment on every article.

So many stories like this in Chicago.

Just a friendly heads up to anyone who hasn’t already clicked- do NOT look at the comments on the Samsung Bixby article. It is cross posted, and sweet baby jesus, the comments are a total misogyny-fueled dumpster fire. Evidently propagating sexism is ‘no reason to get outraged, bruh!’, and the public prefers…

A girl running laps, naked, with a chain on her neck apologizing for not “performing” is not fucking strange but not contacting your parents is? What kind of dumb fuckery is that?! This...person is “claiming” she knew of one girl who began a relationship as child and that wasn’t fucked up enough? Suddenly, after what…

This is a disturbing read, but what I find fascinating is the R. Kelly still holds concerts/