this is actually pretty cool!

love the sarcasm in this post.

you misspelled it twice. one might question if you really had a boxster. but then again, who would lie about having one!

flame paint jobs are attracted to chain link fences. on the bright side, at least he gets to correct that mistake.

well if anyone had a clue about filming ANYTHING then i’m sure all of you geniuses could have came up with something that doesn’t fail. entire video was painful. i’d like 20 seconds of my life back because that’s all i could watch.

this would’ve ended itself in 10 more seconds. both guys were so winded after exchanging a few slaps that they would’ve walked away. so sad.

you own a Box-ter?

i think it would be more appropriate to paste what the rules are for cutting people off and the minimum width to give.

when I drive myself into the dealer to replace my failed air suspension, CarMax will pay every penny of the bill. Assuming I make it.

came here for tits, left with mangina’s...title was misleading.

agreed...very enjoyable to read. most can relate to the exact same questions and ideas.

i would never let it go. not that i’m always right or want to be right, but I would want to know if i’m spewing garbage as well. nowadays, it’s very difficult to get away with bullshit. just pull out the phone and in seconds you’ll have an answer and avoid a possible argument. people are happier when they’re smarter.

i always used the hazard lights for a second to signal thank you. reason is, if someone double flashes their high beams to warn of police as they pass you in the opposite direction, they can take a look in the rear view mirror and see you signal your hazards.

this made my day...

it’s not a great looking car by any means, but it’s also not GTR R35 ugly.

i see your point. the wagon isn’t so much a downgrade to a SUV/CUV, but there are less wagons to choose from compared to SUV’s. an SUV for me would be “settling” as it’s easier to find and would get the job done, albight, the wagon would be more convenient and practical.

i do, not that i’m the majority. i’m in need of a CUV/SUV or at least a wagon for that matter. light towing with enough room to haul lumber and ass is what i need. each category has vehicles that fit the bill.

I think what’s “fun” about this car is not all those idiotic design flaws that “Munro” was rambing about. I agree about building fun sub $100k cars, but let’s not make impractical things due to terrible design.

the lesson here is: money can’t buy good taste.

it doesn’t surprise me what people can adapt to. let’s face it, those quirks are so ridiculous that they would deter a normal person from buying this car. it’s like they went out of their way to make this car less “normal.”