Nobody said they were equivalent though.....

I believe he means not a difficult hike for people familiar with hiking. There’s a nice wide easy trail the whole way up. No bush whacking or difficult barriers of crossing.

Thank god people like you were the minority or we would have never saved the world in WW1 or WW2

So we just stand back and allow a modern day Hitler to slaughter innocents?

So just let a dictator attack his general population with chemical weapons? P

Because they grew up in a world where the leader of communism killed more people than Hitler and was an immediate threat to the existence of humanity and see socialism for what it is, a pathway to communism

I’m willing to bet that you would be WAY too much of a pussy to go through with A killing a man and B being killed by his people right afterwards.

Under the Sea will always be a better Karaoke song than A Part of Your World

So only risky investments produce good? You are making 0 sense. There is no difference between an “investment” and an INVESTMENT as you put it, there is a difference in risk levels, and for someone reason you equate risk to social good for who knows what reason. What are you trying to get at?

everyone is allowed to be as risky as they want, if you force people to be too risky you are simply adding to a greater systematic risk, which if defaults get too high will shock the system, creating another financial crisis

You don’t know what you are talking about. the vast majority of money received by billionaires is reinvested. the idea that they are a bunch of Scrooge Mcducks hoarding away all their money is a complete lie. I had to do a research paper just last year and all evidence shows that the amount of capital kept on hand…

But how can they fine him for tweets he made 5 years ago?

No, it caused a potential ally, Silicon Valley CEOs are pretty much uniformly against the immigration ban, to step out of a role where he had the ability to counsel the president on how the ban negatively impacts the economy.

I’m not against auditing the votes at all. I just hope you realize that there is literally not one person in the intelligence community who thinks that voting machines were tampered with in any way.

I think you took my second comment too literally, I was trying to point out the absurdity of hacking voting machines, machines that are not online in any way. It would be the equivalent of somebody online hacking my N64. There is absolutely nobody in the intelligence community suggesting that was a possibility.

The only reason why is because he knows that Hillary is more likely to send troops to regions to fight Russian interests than Trump is. And frankly, I’m all for keeping our troops out of harms way. Let Putin get involved in the Middle East all he wants, it has done nothing for us.

How do you know Hillary didn’t hack voting machines in the states that she won?

I’m just saying that the phrasing implies that they hacked voting machines or something of the sort. I have multiple friends who thought that was the case just because of the wording. Did not realize that made me a scumbag.

I hate that the spin phrase is “Russia Hacked the Election” Russia didn’t hack the election, they didn’t rig voting machines. They hacked DNC emails and simply made them available for the public. Its the same thing as Snowden leaking NSA finals. They just brought shady political machinations into the light.

Ratings/money