Certainly, the manner in which she disavows her vote and her subsequent foreign policy stances are also relevant. Clinton’s bellicose AIPAC rhetoric, calling “the Iranians” her “enemy,” are ominous, and her interventionism in Libya and Central America demonstrate that she hasn’t learned from her profound lapse in…
Clinton’s Iraq vote isn’t a purity test, it’s a devastating lapse in judgement.
Voting for Iraq was a massive mistake with profound consequences. It should be scrutinized. There was enough information to take a more prudent stance on authorizing a pre-emptive military action: Bush did not make the case that Iraq was an imminent threat to the United States, even then, and then he proceeded over…
Sanders is wrong on reparations, could do more to disavow the U.S.’s military policy legacy, and his economic platform verges on protectionism, not humanism: he should be advancing worker rights across the world.
He doesn’t deserve my certainty, even if he is the candidate most amenable to addressing these issues, I’m…
this is prescience and good policy. swoon:
The gymnastics here are astounding.
You’re going to have to elaborate for me to understand.
why do you say that?
that’s cause you’re white
Clinton (Hillary) should denounce these remarks, and her own mistreatment of BLM protesters.
It is something we wouldn’t do if genders were reversed. Something to think about.
His 91 and 94 speeches on criminal justice reform are pretty good, too.
It’s interesting that the judge framed it this way though he believes the opposite; it’s actually quite lucid:
rapes are gender-motivated hate crimes.
Not me, I remember!
Joe Biden sucks. He among other things, has the same connections to big banks as Clinton, voted for Iraq, and *authored* the 1994 crime bill.
I’m curious about what role she wanted. Furiosa was the role of a lifetime, though.
at least it’s not chew
