The commenter’s point is that accusations of sexual abuse by Clinton are common knowledge and don’t require sources, similar to Trump’s bigotry.

How is it pathetic to support the victims of sexual abuse in the face of an unjust system?

You disagree that victims should be supported against an unjust system, or just these victims?

So you’re supporting the accusers now?

If you’re for victims’ rights, you’re for them universally.

The education system in Europe is comprehensively better, and I’ve gathered that from speaking with my friends who know 3 or 4 languages, pick them up quickly, and have a deeper and broader toolkit to make connections than their American counterparts. Math is beautiful independent of STEM or STEAM initiatives.

To be fair, we’re not really good at that either. Most Europeans are better at math than us, speak more languages, and are more well-read.

The whole damn system is guilty.

Ghost in the Shell, Ridiculous 6, Protagonist in Hunger Games, there’s more

what about future victims?

Some cases get argued up the supreme court to actually explore the legal principles and limits.

He reversed his position, so I suppose it’s all good now, but his prescription for how the movement should proceed with the Sanders campaign supposes that black people are unable to to describe their own grievances or make their own choices effectively, and needed his white paternalistic worldview to toe the line…

And Gawker is hypocritical on racism. Consider that Hamilton Nolan is considered a large part of the social justice “voice”, and wrote a racist article criticizing Black Lives Matter’s successful confrontation with Bernie Sanders (would Sanders have said Sandra Bland’s name without that confrontation? No. Racial…

To be fair, Jezebel penned a lot of that particular criticism against Girls; its own Lena Dunham fixation helped amplify that criticism into the public discourse. (Compare to Sex and the City, which faced no such criticism). And not to get back into the vortex, but Jezebel has not scrutinized other shows or producers…

I think she could have been more clever to get a real response from Kelley, but I personally like that she started with a genuine question from a fan.

It was a notable collaboration regardless of the success, and probably would have been more successful if the music video they made together didn’t reference rape itself. He’s had success after the allegations. He still has a platform. Again, the question by the twitter user was valid in a HuffPoLive forum (it was…

I think the line of questioning is fair, and the tweeted question he avoided is a reasonable question for Kelley to answer in that format. His evasion of the initial question caused the trajectory of the rest of the interview.

Not everyone knows what he did, and he certainly has not answered for it. The causative factors for his decline in sales are up for debate; he still participates in society, and he had platinum albums and worked with other notable artists (e.g. Lady Gaga) after the allegations.

Taking questions from the public at large is nothing new. Rapists shouldn’t have platforms. If the criminal justice system fails us, like it did with Kelley, Polanski, and Allen, then yes it’s up to the media to reconcile this failure.

R Kelly shouldn’t have a platform. If he still wants one, this is what it looks like.

And this is after the the legit twitter question he outright evaded.